Showing posts with label The Guardian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Guardian. Show all posts

Thursday, August 19, 2021

Opuscula

Media giants invited
To assign reporters
To Hamas target areas

THIS IS A SPECIAL INVITATION to reporters and photographers employed by The Major Media Outlets, e.g.,

    ABC

    BBC

    CBS

    CNN

    LA Times

    MSNBC

    NY Times

    The Guardian

    Washington Post

to name but a few of the purveyors of half truths and outright lies to come to Israel and set up shop close to the Gaza border.

 

If that is too close for comfort, let them rent quarters in Ashkelon, Ashdod, Holon, even Tel Aviv.

I might even be willing to let a reporter stay in our guest room in Yavne, but he — or she — will not have safe room privileges.

The reporter then can get a feel for what Israelis already know.

The sirens.

The booms.

The falling debris if the Iron Dome takes out a missile, or the explosion as a missile hits if the Iron Dome somehow misses its target.

The terrified children and pets.

The traumatized adults.

The reporter can sit on the balcony and watch for unguided missiles from Gaza.

Perhaps the reporter’s credentials and PRESS vest will offer all needed protection.

    An aside.

    When I was in elementary school, we had bomb drills because “The Russians are coming” with atomic weapons.

    In Indiana, we raced — I tumbled — down flights of stairs to the basement.

    In Florida, we hid under our desks, as if THAT would do any good.

    We built and stocked bomb shelters where we could.

    Later, in Israel I learned that my new pals from the Ukraine were doing basically the same thing because “The Americans are coming.”

    In America I was a reporter and editor. When something happened, good or bad, I had to be in the thick of things. Foolish? Perhaps.

    But I reported from “Ground Zero.”

    That’s all I am asking of the reporters and photographers covering Gaza’s terror attacks.

Censorship

It is my understanding that reporters and photographers in Gaza have their work heavily censored. If they displease the powers that be, they will be prevented from transmitting their copy to “the world.”

I have no doubt that Israeli censors can be as severe, but Israel is not known for abusing media people, even those biased against Israel.

Moreover, a reporter or photographer can trot his or her stuff to an embassy or consulate representing the employer’s country and file from there.

Few countries have a diplomatic presence in Gaza.

Hamas and “friends” have reporters who see Hamas (and Islamic Jihad and …) in action.

They might even see missiles being removed from UN schools and hospitals and fired from heavily populated civilian areas.

They might even report on these things assuming they get out of Gaza with their stories and photos and assuming they won’t have to go back into Gaza.

It is bad enough when people who never have BEEN to Israel repeat lies about the country, but when reporters and photographers fail to report accurately what is transpiring — they may as well be on Hamas’ payroll.

Some reporters and photographers try to be fair, but editorial boards often demand that material be slanted to suit management’s political point of view.

Hitler (left) and Goebbels (right): infamous liars

 


 

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

 

 

 

Comment on Media invitation

Friday, March 20, 2015

ERM-BC-COOP:

Two HR situations
Worth considering

 

TWO HR-RELATED ISSUES linked from the Friday, March 20 2015 AdvisenFPN news round-up caught my eye:

While the two headlines may seem unrelated to, say, factory employment, both could impact all organizations.

The first, from the Myrtle Beach (SC) Sun News, reports that court records show a stray bullet struck the dancer in the abdomen after a fight broke out at the club, resulting in loss of a kidney.

It IS an unusual on-the-job injury, but the club owners may have come out ahead - even considering the probability of increased workman's compensation payments - by putting the burden on workman's comp rather than having to defend the club's policies in court for apparently allowing armed customers into the facility.

Datelined Columbia SC, the Myrtle Beach paper's leed (cq) read:

    An exotic dancer who was shot at a Columbia nightclub is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for her injury, the S.C. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in what could be a potentially precedent-setting decision for topless performers in the Palmetto State.
.
The article quoted the dancer's attorney as stating “This is a message to employers of this industry that, if they are going to bring young, often uneducated laborers into this industry to make huge profits, then they need to have workers’ compensation to cover these unforeseen accidents.”.

The article also noted that as far as the state's workman's comp is concerned, the dancer was an employee of the club, not an independent contractor.

While this is one instance for one job type in one state, the state supreme court's ruling could be, as the reporter wrote, "precedent-setting," not only for dancers and the places where they work, but for all jobs in all places in all states.

The second, from England's The Guardian newspaper starts off

    A bus driver wrongly accused of using cocaine has won a substantial payout after arguing that the traces of the drug must have come from passengers’ money.
The driver was randomly tested for drugs using a saliva test. The test indicated he had used cocaine. The driver denied this.

Without further ado, he was fired from his job of 22 years.

At his own expense, the driver had the more accurate hair follicle test for cocaine done by his own doctor. That test was negative, supporting the driver's claim that he was drug free.

The bus company refused to hire the driver back.

He went to court with evidence that, at least in England, paper currency is often tainted with cocaine. According to the driver's legal team, it was estimated that in the UK upwards of 88% of banknotes carry detectable traces of the drug..

The driver's attorney contends that the bus company failed to carry out proper investigations before dismissing such a long-serving employee with an impeccable record

In the England case, the employer might have avoided any legal entanglement by being less hasty in its actions - suspending the driver until it - not the driver - ordered and funded the hair follicle test - and immediately reinstated the driver, with back pay, when the second test proved negative.

Instead, the bus company apparently elected to stand by the initial test and the following dismissal even in light of the new evidence.