Showing posts with label WhatsApp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WhatsApp. Show all posts

Thursday, April 2, 2020

Opuscula

Isolate,
Sequester.
Quarantine

I HEAR PEOPLE SAYING “Now I know how Anne Frank felt” hiding from the nazis for 761 days in the Secret Annex.

Today we have a plethora of ways to talk to people around the globe. We even can, with the right tools, see them face-to-face.

Anne Frank lacked those tools.

Her world was the “Secret Annex” and the seven other people who shared it with her.

 

 

THE CHINESE VIRUS, as President Trump correctly identifies it, has changed the lifestyle of most of us.

There are some, the entitled generation who go about pleasure as usual, knowing IF they become infected, the likelihood that they will survive with only minimal discomfort is great.

Never mind that they may, through their cavalier, hedonistic, attitude, infect others — both the very young and the elderly. “Not my problem.”

CONFESSION

I hate telephones, but I realize they are a “necessary evil.”

For most of my 70-plus years I have communicated in writing. I used to have a good “hand” and, frankly, I was proud of it. My words? Always room for improvement.

For several decades I have used email to share what I know with people whom I hope want to read what I write.

But mail — “snail” or electronic — is not the same as a face-to-face conversation. It’s great for “CYA” situations, but — as with the telephone — you cannot see your correspondent’s face as what you wrote is read or as a reply is communicated..

Since I have (and have had) a computer for many years — OK, many computers over many years; designed obsolescence in action — I have had applications that allow me to see and talk to people around the globe.

Skype, before it as MS Skype, for awhile.

Now Facebook’s WhatsApp.

Google's DUO – a company that obsoletes applications almost as fast as it acquires them.

Zoom.

Some friends and family prefer WhatsApp; great on iPhone or Android “smartphones,” but not so good on a computer — it does text OK and images transfer, but on the computer users cannot see the other party/parties.

Zoom works on “smartphones” and the desktop; it seems popular with businesses although it offers a free version geared to the individual.

Bottom line: today even being home-bound, a person need not be isolated.

For several years I worked from my home office and communicated with 42 remote sites in 17 different states and never — never — traveled from my house.

Of course when the Internet Service Provider (ISP) crashes, everything on the desktop is out of service, too. The mobile phone is another story for some things.

By and large, however, today’s sequestered individuals still have access to “The World.”

They can read news blogs — the media’s veracity may be questionable, but it is there to read — they can call family and friends, even their elected officials who may, or may not, be responsive. If there is a window, they can gaze out as they communicate electronically.

This is not Anne Franks’ world.

Sequestered or quarantined — call it what you will — will not prevent anyone from reaching out.

Unless the isolation is in a hospital or similar setting where communications tools may be banned from isolation areas for the patient’s protection. Some diseases can be transferred to patient property that cannot be sanitized without being ruined. Most cellphones, tablets, and computers would not survive an autoclave session.

Isolation related to the Chinese virus is only “semi-isolation.”

People still can go out to buy food; delivery people still can deliver. But, except for necessities, a walk around the block is about the maximum distance to wander.

Since this was keyed, residents of my area are confined by executive order to their yards — if they HAVE a yard. Pity the apartment dwellers.

In Israel, police will arrest people who go more than 100 meters (that is about 330 feet) from their door.

This is not Anne Frank’s isolation.

 

Stay home

According to Florida’s governor — who may very well be a one-term governor — about 190 airplanes arrive in Florida every day. Many are from New York-New Jersey-Conneticut, an epicenter of the Chinese virus.

Florida, particularly south Florida, already has hundreds of cases of the disease.

Florida is scrambling to get enough test kits to test Floridians — never mind the folks from New York and similar locales.

The governor claims that all passengers will be tested — “temperature tested” one guesses — and then told to go into “a 14-day self-quarantine or isolation period.”

Editorial opinion: FAT CHANCE!

Floridians already see 20-somethings flaunting the laws on the supposedly closed beaches.

Who cares if the young people infect others; they are — but maybe not — immune from any serious illness.

Never mind the burden their excursions to Florida put on the state’s ability to protect its citizens health and, frankly, their wallets as its Floridian’s tax dollars that will fund testing (with or without promised assistance from the Federal government).

Floridians’ advice to anyone getting on a plane, train, bus, or even a private automobile: STAY HOME

If the governor really wants to protect the citizens, he needs to close the borders.

Winter is over.

 



 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Isolation

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Opuscula

I like “cheap”

ALL THINGS CONSIDERED, I prefer to pay less for something.

If it meets my needs why spend more?

My flivver is a 2008 Hyundai Elantra. I get the oil & filter changed every 3,500 miles or so. The vehicle is MECHANICALLY in great shape; the interior no so much, but it gets me from Point A to Point B just fine.

Could a Caddy do better? Do I need the speed of a souped up (do people still use that expression) pony?

It’s pretty good on fuel as long as I stray within the legal limit and its fairly comfortable — all-in-all, I consider it money well spent.

I’ve had Fords, Lincolns, Oldsmobiles, Buicks, and even an American Motors Rebel wagon — another good vehicle — but the Hyundai does the job and I’m happy with it.

My daughter gifted me with a smart phone. It’s a Redmi 6A. Hardly a top of the line Motorola or Samsung, but it turns out it sounds better than the Spouse’s more expensive (and slightly bigger) LG.

All the reviews I’ve read are that it is a very good phone for the money.

It meets my needs as a phone, a text message exchanger, and a platform for WhatsApp.

What’sApp for anyone who doesn’t know, is a free, international voice/image service similar to Skype but sans the heavy hand of Microsoft. The “better performance” mentioned above is via WhatsApp.

The daughter got the phones as part of a wireless plan. She also got one for her 7 year old daughter, a/k/a My Favorite Grand-daughter. (She’s my only grand-daughter so no one will have hurt feelings.)

The Princess & her Twin Princes

The phone is a “little” small for my fat fingers, but the Spouse gifted me with a stylus from a neighborhood dollar store. The $1 stylus includes ! a flashlight (torch for those from across the pond) and a red (ruby?) laser pointer. Both work on a replaceable battery — and all for one U.S. dollar.

Actually, styluses — to be correct, “stylii” — are 10 for $10 on line, but with a flashlight AND laser pointer?

Our phone service — smart phones and pseudo-landline — are from Consumer Cellular.

Consumer Cellular, hereafter “CC,” is a pretty good service. I have a ZTE “wireless home base” that converts cell phone signals to something my ancient Uniden cordless system (of two stations) can use.

The Unidens are often more comfortable to use than cell phones of any type, especially when on hold.

CC just sent me an email telling me it was upgrading the service to four or five “G.”

I’ll have to swap out a SIM card and hopefully the card will match my account. Fortunately, CC has “pretty good” customer support; it’s better technically than the billing unit.

The combined CC bill — two cell phones with voice, text and data, and the ZTE (voice only) is less than the bill for our former landline-only service.

Since 90% of all data — including WhatsApp — is via our modem/router, our data usage with CC is minimal. (We still have the ISP to finance.)

My name is not Benjamin Kubelsky (right) and I am not “cheap.” It is just that I hate to pay for a “name” that the only benefit it carries is snobbishness.

True, a Caddy may be better built than my Hyundai — then why doesn’t it have Hyundai's 10 year/100,000 mile factory warranty? — and a Moto smart phone may have a better camera — but does it compare to my 4*5 (inch) technical camera or my old Canon F-1?

My Spouse drives a Benz 350 that is so technologically advanced she can’t use many of the goodies. We had a Jaguar X40 (a/k/a XJ6) — in order to change a headlight the whole front end had to be removed ! — and neither vehicle was as reliable as the Hyundai.

I won’t buy something because it is inexpensive if it is cheap.

“Cheap” meaning “shoddily made” or “made of inferior materials.” That is throwing good money after bad (or something); in the end it is wasteful.

But, when I find something that has good value for the money (even if it is manufactured in China such as are the cell phones and the stylus — the Hyundai is from South Korea), if I have a need for the item, I’ll buy it.

There is a difference between being frugal and being Benjamin Kubelsky cheap.



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Being Frugal