U.S. and Euro-liberals are all a’twitter over President Trump’s withdrawal of the U.S. from Obama’s one-sided deal with Iran.
The “deal” was supposedly to assure that the ayatollahs didn’t get “The Bomb” to throw at Israel, Sunni Muslim countries, and U.S. interests within range of Iran’s missiles.
In return, Obama removed sanctions on Iran and freed up billions of dollars for the war mongers. Euro-liberals sold Iran components for an N bomb and North Korea provided technical expertise.
- Is Kim expecting Iran to become his proxy in a war with the U.S.?
Multiple resources have pointed out a long list of things that made Obama’s Iran deal a bad deal for the U.S. and any country within ICBM range of Iran.
According to more than a few U.S. “experts,” the U.S. has known “most” of what Israel’s Mossad uncovered in Iran. The “best guess” is that what the U.S. allegedly “already knew” also
Obama’s gift to the ayatollahs was freedom to do whatever they wanted on military installations; installations that were exempt from inspections in his Iran deal.
The International Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) inspectors were prevented from 24/7 access to non-military sites by the Iranians; sometimes by as much as 24 hours or more, plenty of time to relocate prohibited activities. Just as Iraq’s Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti moved military materials out of Iraq and into Syria between Gulf wars. There are many (leftists) who claim that never happened; that the weaponry was just a figment of a Bush administration’s imagination.
Iran was allowed to develop nuclear power for peaceful uses. Electric generating plants, as an example.
Obama was certain the Iranians lacked:
- 1. A trigger device for a nuclear bomb and
2. A delivery vehicle.
Thanks to North Korean technology and European components, the ayatollahs are close to developing the triggering device.
Again, thanks to North Korean technology and European components, with a little help from Putin and his Russian sycophants, the ayatollahs have delivery systems that can reach 2,500 km (~1 553 mi) from Tehran.
That means all or parts of
- Afghanistan, Bulgaria, China, Egypt, India, Iraq, Israel, Kyrgystan, Kzakhstan, Pakistan, “Palestinian Authority,” Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbeckistan
Would the ayatollahs use nuclear weapons to murder thousands of fellow Muslims? As long as the Muslims are any sect BUT Shia, the ayatollah’s version of Islam. (If anyone doubts that, consider the war between Shia Iran and Sunni Iraq. Estimates range from 228,000 to 1.1 million killed during the eight year-long conflict. The financial toll was estimated at US$1.188 trillion.1
According to The Tower2,
David Albright, Institute for Science and International Security President , in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, said said that the documents that the Israelis found showed that Iran had a “sleeping” nuclear weapons program. He called it a “stewardship program,” which came into being when Iran decided to make its AMAD program for developing nuclear weapons inactive in 2003. Iran intended for the program to remain dormant until such a time when it could “pop up” and be revived to develop nuclear weapons.
Iran kept documentation and hid it from inspectors. By keeping the documentation, Iran did not, in fact, denuclearize as required by the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Albright also pointed out that Section T in the JCPOA states “that under no circumstances will Iran ever seek, develop or acquire any nuclear weapons.” Iran put the head of the AMAD nuclear weapons program, Dr. Mohsen Fakhrizade, in charge of the secret stewardship program. This made the stewardship program, effectively, a program “contributing to nuclear weapons,” that was forbidden by the JCPOA.
Iran’s MEHR News Agency3 reports that
- AEOI spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi has said in Iran no figure is authorized to give access to IAEA to visit military sites, and there is essentially nothing included in the Safeguards Agreement, Additional Protocol, and JCPOA, regarding the issue.
Dismissing the quartet conditions of the President of the United States Donald Trump, regarding JCPOA renegotiation, Kamalvandi said “in the past, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog inspected Iran's Parchin military site and the case was closed, and now there is no request from IAEA to have access to a military site in the country.”
“Access has its own rules; it will never happen for quenching the curiosities; accessing military sites is according to the articles defined in the protocol, where only nuclear activities are done,” he said adding "we do not have any nuclear activity at any military site at all, and we are not a country seeking nuclear bombs and weapons.”
President Trump has suggested on more than one occasion that the U.S. would consider renegotiating an agreement with the ayatollahs on terms more favorable to the U.S.
Meanwhile, the UN’s IAEC sees no reason to request access to Iranian military sites that both President Trump and the Israeli government contend are being used to develop a nuclear weapon to sit atop its missiles.
Sources
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War
2. http://tinyurl.com/ya973fg7
PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment