Thursday, May 23, 2019

Opuscula

Pols need to pay
Their own way
When campaigning



THE PRESIDENT IS SPENDING MY TAX MONEY to campaign for re-election or for his favored candidates.

Every president has done this since Hector was a pup.

It used to be presidents campaigned from the last car on a special train.

Then, everyone could come to the tracks to wave (or boo) as the train whizzed past. At major stops, crowds would gather (be gathered?) to hear the candidate speak. If the president was campaigning for a fellow party candidate, the hopeful shared the platform with the Big Draw — president, state senator, etc.

 

Presidential Rides: Left FDR campaign train; right, Air Force One

 

Now, presidents travel in Air Force One, currently a Made-In-America Boeing 747.

Like the presidential trains that proceeded it, Air Force One is is a financial hole in the air. (The special trains weren’t “cheap” and they forced scheduled trains onto sidings while the Big Shots rolled on to their next stop.)

I know presidents and other Big Shots need to campaign for themselves and for candidates who support their ideas, but at what cost?

Is a 747 really necessary?

There are smaller jets available.

 

Made-In-America Gulfstream business jet in Air Force livery

 

I know — I’m given to understand — that the president’s plane has special secure communications gear on board so the Commander-In-Chief can talk to almost anyone at any time.

But does it take a jumbo jet to haul the comm center from here to there?

Let’s “assume” — and we all know what “assume” does — that a jumbo jet is the only option for a Big Shot.

If that’s the case, MAKE THE CAMPAIGN PAY FOR THE RIDE.

Why should my tax dollars go to support candidates I would not vote for even if there was no opposition?

The president flies to, say Nebraska, to campaign for a candidate for congress.

I don’t live in Nebraska and, presidential ally or not, I don’t know, or care about Nebraska politics. Maybe the president makes intermediate stops on his way from D.C. to Nebraska. Each take off and landing is a financial burden … on the taxpayer — me.

    Every time a president comes to my neck of the woods, his presence screws up traffic, causes local taxpayers a bundle for additional security, and disrupts airport activity. Dear Mr. President: Stay in D.C.

Campaigning on the taxpayer’s dollar is an on-going disgrace.

Even without leaving D.C., candidates take advantage of franking privileges. OK, even thought they don’t pay for stamps, it does give the USPS letter carriers something to deliver — more junk mail.

The media also must foot a campaigner’s bill with free space (printed media) and air time (radio and tv). I suppose it’s fair since some campaign budgets can‘t afford “equal time.” (This is in addition to almost obligatory “public service announcements” such as “Join the Army.”)

If they can’t afford equal time, perhaps not many people support the candidate and he, or she, should “get the message” and quit the campaign trail.

I believe in democracy; it may not be perfect, but IMO it is the best thing we have. (I also believe some people cannot handle democracy and return time and time again to a dictatorship; Cuba being a prime example in the Western hemisphere.

FOR THE RECORD: My complaint is “party independent.” Both parties have abused the taxpayer for as long as there have been campaigns. Before the Democrats and Republicans there were the Federalists and Whigs.

I am reasonably sure that politicians elsewhere are no better at considering the taxpayers’ wallets.


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

BCPLANNER: Comments on Make Pols Pay

Friday, May 17, 2019

Opuscula

Educational FPN:
A "must have" for
Risk practitioners

I AM A LONG-TIME SUBSCRIBER TO Advisen Front Page News (FPN) 1. While Advisen’s main target market is the insurance industry, I have always found it a “must have” for enterprise risk management practitioners (i.e., this scrivener).

On Friday, May 17, FPN presented me with several items that caught my attention.

FROM ADVISEN FPN for 17 May 2019:

Schools turn to technology to reduce toll during shootings2

    An AP story lead reads: Efforts to combat school shootings are starting to shift from preventing the violence to reducing the number of victims through technology that speeds up law enforcement’s response and quickly alerts teachers and students to danger.

    Technology is nice, but if this article is accurate, then the schools are “closing the barn door after the horses have escaped.”

    The AP’s second paragraph notes that School districts are using products like gunshot detection systems that identify where shots are fired and apps that allow teachers to report attacks and connect with police. While a focus on gun control often emerges after shootings, technology can be a less partisan solution that’s quick to implement — though some experts say funding preventive mental health resources should be the priority.

    All that is good, but it ALL is “after the shooting starts," and to this practitioner’s mind, that is (take your choice) foolish, stupid, or a dereliction of duty by the people charged with keeping our students — of all ages — safe.

 

Alleged Somali war criminal has been driving for Uber, Lyft in Virginia3

    The Washington Examiner reports that An accused Somali war criminal has been driving for Uber and Lyft in the suburbs of Northern Virginia for the past 18 months.

    An investigation by CNN reveled that Yusuf Abdi Ali, also known as “Colonel Tukeh,” has been working full time for the companies and is an “Uber Pro Diamond” driver with a 4.89 rating.

    Ali told undercover reporters who were riding with him that it was easy to get approved to drive for the companies.

While I am concerned enough to discourage my spouse from using either company, especially after dark, my initial reaction to the Examiner story is: “How the devil did this guy get into the U.S.?”

So much for the highly flaunted (both meanings) vetting process.

The Examiner/CNN article carefully avoided mentioning when — under whose watch — this alleged Somali war criminal entered the U.S. and on what type visa. Did he enter from Somalia as a refuge? Did he enter from a third country?

 

Canada: Car Surfing Is An Ordinary And Well-Known Activity4

    From the Canadian Litigation Counsel via the Mondaq web site, readers learn that even though it is a criminal activity insurers are still on the hook for some people’s stupidity.

    According to the article, In Charbonneau v Intact Insurance Company, 2018 ONSC 5660, the plaintiff stood on the rear bumper of a 2013 Nissan Quest which was in motion. She held onto the roof rack with one hand, and onto a friend's shoulder with the other hand. When the driver made a sharp turn, the plaintiff fell and hit her head on the concrete. The plaintiff commenced a claim against Intact Insurance Company for accident benefits coverage under s. 3(1) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule – Effective September 1, 2010.

    In Alberta, "accident", for the purposes of the Insurance Act dealing with automobile insurance, means an accident arising from the use or operation of an automobile.<

    Why make an insurance company pay for a person’s injuries when the person was injured committing a crime, as the plaintiff — assuming the report is factual — clearly was doing, standing “on the rear bumper of a 2013 Nissan Quest which was in motion. She held onto the roof rack with one hand, and onto a friend's shoulder with the other hand. When the driver made a sharp turn, the plaintiff fell and hit her head on the concrete.”

      (Being pedantic, the report should have read: When the car’s driver put the vehicle into a sharp turn . . . but modern reporters and editors don’t bother with grammar and accuracy.)

     

    Insider: $56 Billion Later, Airport Security Is Junk5

      Wired.com tells us that The Department of Homeland Security has spent billions since 9/11 trying to keep dangerous people and dangerous explosives off airplanes, and treating us all air travelers like potential terrorists in the process. But according to a former security adviser to a leading airline, the terrorists have changed the game – and the government hasn't yet caught on.

      According to Ben Brandt, a former adviser to Delta, the airlines and the feds should be less concerned with what gels your aunt puts in her carry-on, and more concerned about lax screening for terrorist sympathizers among the airlines' own work force. They should be worried about terrorists shipping their bombs in air cargo. And they should be worried about terrorists shooting or bombing airports without ever crossing the security gates.

    I know it’s not nice, but I want to yell “VINDICATION” and offer a hearty “Welcome Aboard” to Ben Brandt, a former adviser to Delta. (I hope he is a “former” adviser due to his own volition; people who say what he said usually are not popular with Very Senior Executives.)

    I have for years been telling anyone who would listen that airlines or someone should closely vet ALL personnel who have access to an airplane.

      A can of pineapple soda was converted into the bomb that downed a Russia-bound passenger plane in Egypt — killing all 224 people on board, according to the New York Post on 18 NOV 2015.6
    The same Post article recalled a suicide murderer who blew himself up before boarding a flight at Moscow's Domodedovo. Most Americans remember the shooters at LAX.

    The best defense is still developing solid intelligence on terrorist groups interested in targeting aviation," Brandt said as the Post ends the article.

    Where is the best airport security? Israel.

    Which is the most secure airline? El Al.

    Israel, unlike the U.S. where the Supremes banned it, profiles all passengers. Contrary to Israel bashers, Arabs — Christians and Muslims — clear the inspections in many cases faster and with less hassle than Israeli Jews.

      I have been there and seen this first hand.
    El Al never leaves an aircraft unattended — a security person is on board when the cleaning crews and catering people come on board.
      Again, been there, seen that.
    Never mind that El Al aircraft also have anti-missile defenses.

    People who load luggage into a plane’s hold (baggage area beneath the passengers) are not the best paid people at the airport and can be tempted, by money or ideology, to put more than luggage on board.

    Mechanics also must be vetted; a missing bolt at a critical juncture might bring down a plane.

    Neither Brandt nor I dismiss passengers as a threat; they may be, but they are neither the only nor, in my opinion, the greatest threats to aviation safety.


    Sources

    1. Advisen, http://tinyurl.com/yd8s4fup

    2. Schools, http://tinyurl.com/y33dq2k6

    3. Alleged war criminal, http://tinyurl.com/y3l88j68

    4. Car surfing, http://tinyurl.com/y3wtaq23

    5. Air safety: http://tinyurl.com/y2rfe6lk

    6. Soda can bomb, http://tinyurl.com/y3rnnac7

    PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

    Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

    Comments on FPN

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Opuscula

Is deadly force
Always needed?

I DON’T HAVE ALL THE FACTS. but after another Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) deputy kills another person I am beginning to wonder about BSO’s rules of engagement.

According to local tv “news” reporting on what a BSO spokesperson told the stations1, 2

  • A local man stabs his ex-girlfriend to death with a knife.
  • Officers from multiple jurisdictions respond.
  • Responding Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) see a man with a knife
  • The knife-wielding man is ordered by the officers to put down the knife.
  • The man refuses.
  • A BSO sergeant shoots and kills the man with the knife.

 

My First Born is a LEO in another jurisdiction.

When I related the incident to him, his response was “meet deadly force with deadly force.”

I expect that is the mindset of all, or at least most, LEOs. I can understand that, but  . . .

 

Maybe the knife-wielding man was “high” on something and was incapable of making a reasoned decision.

Maybe the knife-wielding man was remorseful for slaying his ex-girlfriend and wanted to commit “suicide by cop,” an all too frequent nightmare for most LEOs.

There could be many “maybe”s; the responding officers from the BSO and other jurisdictions couldn’t know the man’s thoughts.

Still.

With the number of responding LEOs — there were three from the BSO alone — why did they have to kill the man?

There were

  • Multiple LEOs on the scene
  • Most must have been armed with Tasers3, a/k/a normally non-deadly stun guns
  • Most must have been provided batons (billy clubs or night sticks).
Was the man with the knife threatening the LEOs? Was he focusing on one specific LEO?

I wasn’t there so everything here is speculation.

Could the LEOs, who had the man outnumbered at least 3-to1 (and the suggestion from the tv is that there were more LEOs on scene than just the three from the BSO) have disarmed him using non-lethal means: Tasers, batons.?

I am not a criminal coddling liberal and I stand solidly with LEOs who truly are threatened; I agree with my First Born, “meet deadly force with deadly force.”

But I wonder: Was the knife-wielding person capable of using “deadly force” against the LEOs? Was there no other way to subdue the person?

I repeat: I was not at the scene and all the above is speculation.

Will body cameras show what happened from the time the LEOs arrived on scene until the fatal shot was fired?


Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/yy62zod9

2. http://tinyurl.com/yyxtubke

3. Taser is a product of Axon (https://www.axon.com/)

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Deadly force

Sunday, May 12, 2019

Opuscula

American English:
Living language
Or just abused?

AS I LISTEN TO talking heads on tv I wonder: “When did the language change?”

BACK IN THE DAY, words I learned in elementary (primary, grade) school usually had specific meanings.

Now, many of those words have disappeared from use or had their meanings broadened.

As examples

    *  Moment: my unabridged dictionaries used to list “moment” as 90 seconds, a minute and a half.
    *  Sex: Once “sex” was for humans and animals; it was not to be confused with “gender.”
    *  Gender: Words in many languages — MOST languages — have gender. A “city” in Hebrew is feminine while a “horse” is masculine. Why one is feminine and another is masculine is known only to the original Hebrew speakers. Russian, Spanish. French likewise are “gender aware.” (I don’t know any Oriental languages so I won’t comment on them.)
    *  Actors were men; actresses were women.
I was reading a tube of toothpaste as I squeezed a glob of the stuff onto my toothbrush.

The tube told me that modern Colgate® has Cavity Protection.

Why would anyone, other than perhaps a someone working in a dental office, want to protect cavities. Wouldn’t it be better to protect against cavities or prevent cavities?

Maybe this is a case of “opposite speak” in which “bad” means “good.”

Bob Dylan (right) was right, “The times they are a-changin'”1 at least as far as American English goes.

I still remember how to use in and into.

    Some boys were in and around a “swimmin’ hole.” Some of the boys were in in the water, some were “bank walkers,” and one was diving into the water. OK, so the original story omitted the bank walkers, but I’ve heard the story since I was knee high to a grasshopper.
I’m not sure any “swimmin’ holes” are pollution-free anymore and bank walking will get the walkers arrested for public exposure. Again, Dylan was right.

It can be challenging to read a Shakespeare sonnet in the original English.

I fear that soon, if it has not already occurred, people will struggle to read Tom Sawyer”2 or The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County3, two of Samuel Langhorne Clemens many works.

Clemens’ works are under fire in some communities for failing the “political correctness” demanded of today, similar to the disappearance of Uncle Remus and Song of the South — never mind that Joel Chandler Harris’ Uncle Remus stories had a moral attached. (Song of the South, originally written in “dialect” IS difficult to read/comprehend, but the moral of each tale prevails.)

The tv talking heads regularly abuse unique. Unique is unique. It cannot be “most” unique or “extremely” unique or even “very” unique. Something could be “almost” unique, but probably “very unusual” or “exceedingly rare” would be better.

I don’t mind coined words; it is to misused words I object.

Almost all cars today seem to be advertised as “Sport Utility Vehicles,” SUVs.

A Jeep® Gladiator with four-wheel drive is an SUV; a BMW® X7, despite claims to the contrary (“full-size luxury SUV”) is not an SUV, even with all-wheel drive. Subaru® has been making “SUVs” for years if all it takes is all-wheel (or four-wheel) drive to make a car an SUV. Just add a roof rack and trailer hitch!

 

Jeep® Gladiator — a true Sport Utility Vehicle

 

Hyundai® still has a line of sedans, albeit it does not identify anything as a “coupe.” (What’s the difference? In the “old days,” a “coupe” was a two-door vehicle and a sedan had four doors. With the exception of the Checker® Marathon (see below) and the Executive Sedan and Limousine from Chrysler®, neither coupe nor sedan had decent rear-seat legroom.)

 

The Checker Marathon had 46.3 inches—nearly four feet of backseat legroom. That was enough room for two folding jump seats, allowing the cab to ac­commo­date six passengers com­fort­ably

 

I’m not a fan of acronyms unless whatever the acronym represents is best known by the acronym. SCUBA is a good example. Most people would be hard pressed to define SCUBA as “Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus.” Likewise “wifi” as “wireless fidelity” (I didn’t know that). As a young reporter, I learned to first “spell it out" and THEN use the initials or acronym. This still is a good idea since so many things share the same abbreviation or acronym. Making things worse for the non-electronic generation are “Internet acronyms.”

Governments are notorious for abbreviations. Some languages have sub-sets that are so filled with esoteric abbreviations that an outsider, were it not for the Internet, would never be able to translate a sentence. A verbal “secret handshake,” if you will.

I know that English is a “living” language and trying to halt change is impossible.

I’m not trying to halt change, just to build on the basics.

Free gift, indeed! If it’s a gift, it’s free.


Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/k2l2l4m

2. http://tinyurl.com/yyopgw3c

3. http://tinyurl.com/pt8ceem

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on English

Thursday, May 9, 2019

Opuscula

How to prevent
School shootings

THE HEADLINE MAY BE A little “wishful thinking,” but by all accounts, what is about to be suggested is feasible.

MULTIPLE STUDIES, including by the federal government, come to the same conclusion:

Pay attention to students’ behavior.

Who needs to pay attention?

  • Parents
  • Teachers
  • Fellow students
  • Medical personnel (pediatricians, family doctors)
Be aware of any changes in a young person’s behavior.

There is moodiness, of course, but there are other “red flags” that the person's character is changing.

  • Increased time on the Internet and a demand for privacy when on the ‘Net
  • A change in friends and an unwillingness to have new friends meet parents/guardians
  • Interests in violent actions, particularly cruelty to animals and defenseless children
  • Class room participation and behavior — homework on time? Test scores as before?
  • Appearance; any major changes in clothing style or personal appearance, e.g., uncombed hair where it once was combed
I am not a lawyer and while I would LIKE to suggest that parents and guardians look at web sites and “social media” their children visit, I’m reasonably certain the ACLU or other such organization would claim “parental snooping” is a violation of a child’s civil rights. (But doesn’t killing another person violate THAT person’s right to life; his or her civil rights?)

It may “take a village” to raise a child; it certainly takes a “village” of concerned parents/guardians, teachers, friends, and others with an opportunity to observe the child. Coupled with “If you see something, say something,” maybe the number of school shootings can be eliminated or at least reduced.

The same advice applies to young adults as well (and a few older adults, too); perhaps the number of drive by shootings could be reduced if the shooter’s friends, co-workers, et al, would say something to SOMEONE — preferably the cops who probably cannot do anything until a crime is committed; maybe Section 8 incarceration for mental evaluation.

Locally, the friends and relatives of drive-by shooting victims hit the bricks demanding that the attacks stop, but few DO anything — Hear No, See No, and Speak No evil. And innocent bystanders, often toddlers, continue to be murdered.

    Black on black crime doesn’t bring out Alfred Charles Sharpton Jr. and Jesse Louis Jackson . Not enough national tv face time, perhaps.


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on School shootings

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Opuscula

Some things change,
Some stay the same:
Blame it on someone

Candorville cartoon by Darrin Bell for 7 May 2019

 

I CONFESS, I’M A COMICS FAN. It started as a small child with the Sunday Funnies in the local paper.

I enjoyed Classics Illustrated® literature as I got older.

And there was EC’s Mad®; I was “hooked” on Spy vs. Spy.

I might have broken my addiction to comics had my first jobs after the Air Force been anything but newspapers; one of the “perks” was a free paper and the paper had, of course, comics. When I worked for Today in Cocoa FL, even the weekday comics were in COLOR! (Cocoa was Gannett’s first experiment with a TODAY newspaper.)

THE MAY 7 Darrin Bell effort caused me to recall my elementary school days. This was before compulsory kindergarten; my school “career” began in Grade 1 at Benjamin Harris PS #2 in Indianapolis.

Then the concern was not “active shooters.” The adults of the time were concerned with The Russians are coming.

If a school had a basement, all the students went into the basement.

No basement? Students “hid” under their desks.

Not that either action would have sufficed against a Russian A-bomb.

    Later in life I met a some Russians who were my contemporaries. Their story was the same as mine, save for them, “the Americans are coming.”
Bell’s cartoons are slightly left-of-center politically. He is not obnoxious as many of the Democrats “on the hill,” but he’s most assuredly left-of-center.

His May 7 cartoon DOES point out a serious problem in today’s schools: crazies with guns and, sometimes, bombs — not on the scale of an A-bomb, but deadly none-the-less.

Bottom line: While some things change (methods) some things stay the same (threat to innocents).

It was amusing to read what GoComics, the site that carries Bell’s several cartons, selected at the best response to the strip.

For two-days running, someone whose name I don’t know and wouldn’t mention anyway, was chosen as the “lead” respondent.

Both yesterday, when the school “arc” started, and today, this person rants and rails against the National Rifle Association, the NRA.

The rants remind me of some of our elected officials who spout “information” about subjects it is obvious they know nothing. The comments from this poster are so outrageous that they must be shared. After all, the person made them public.

    The idea that our small school children should now be routinely traumatized by mass shooter drills — AND ACTUAL LOCKDOWN EMERGENCIES — shows how depraved this nation has become.

    The NRA — which supports the unfettered rights of terrorists, violent felons, domestic abusers and the severely mentally ill to own unlimited assault-style weapons with unlimited magazine capacity and launders illegal foreign contributions from a hostile foreign adversary (Russia) to the Trump campaign — sacrifices our school children, concert goers, movie goers and even church goers on the blood-stained altar of corporate profits for gun manufacturers (domestic gun runners).

    Primitive tribal societies sacrificed their own children to appease the gods and ensure a bounteous harvest.

    The NRA and its most extreme fringe elements sacrifice OTHER PEOPLE’s children on the blood-stained altar of gun manufacturer corporate profits.

Honesty in blogging: I own guns, my sons — one a cop — own guns. NONE of us are members of the NRA.

The anti-NRA ranter cites zero authorities; he, or she, just goes on and on about what I’m certain the poster believes are “facts.”

As a reporter, I learned that I HAD to cite my sources; unless I was an editorial writer I might offer my opinion as long as it was clear that it WAS opinion.

When I read rants sans citations, I immediately am suspicious. In this instance, there ARE citations that counter the poster’s allegations, e.g., none of the shooters has been associated with the NRA; the NRA does not oppose background checks, and the NRA does not promote gun ownership to mentally handicapped persons.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has a PDF file on the Internet titled The School Shooter – A Quick Reference Guide - FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) that on a single page provides a wealth of information about school shooters. Nowhere does it mention membership in the NRA.1, 2

 

GUN REGULATION

There is, in my mind, no question that gun ownership needs to be regulated.

Unfortunately, regulations are not enough.

As examples:

    A recent shooter was diagnosed with a mental problem that, had it been promptly reported would have prevented the shooter from buying a weapon.
    A school shooter took his father’s guns to kill classmates.
    Stolen guns are sold to crazies sans any control.
The NRA is not against gun control that could have prevented any of the above.

Background checks need to take longer than 72 hours and there must be a “checklist” to assure the gun purchaser is eligible to own a gun.

Gun owners MUST keep their weapons either in their hand or locked up. That does not mean sharing access information with a teenager, an age when actions precede thinking about consequences, and certainly not with a six-year-old who cannot fathom the danger of a gun.

I, personally, have no problem with limiting magazine capacity of semi-automatic weapons. Why would a hunter need a 30-round magazine? Better: spend more time on the range to learn how to shoot straight.

Likewise, I fail to see the need for “full-auto” pistols and rifles in civilian hands.

Florida, my state, requires a 72-hour waiting period to buy a pistol; it should apply to rifles as well. The check is cursory and depends on buyer-provided information. A concealed carry license requires fingerprints and, allegedly, the prints are forwarded to an FBI database that depends on its input from local law enforcement.

Florida also has a law that allows a gun to be taken from a person who may have been eligible to own a gun but for one reason or another no longer is eligible. Good law.

Guns acquired illegally — in this case, meaning the sale is not registered — are an on-going problem, even if the weapon was not stolen. A number of guns are not registered because the owners fear the government will confiscate all civilian weapons as was done in elsewhere.

 

BACK TO THE COMICS

This entry started off with a comic by Darrin Bell.

Bell’s point, that it is a shame that today’s kids have to have “active shooter” drills, is valid.

I’m not certain they are “traumatized” any more than students in my day were “traumatized” by bomb drills or even fire drills. There is noise, there is herding of students to “safe” areas.

Teachers can play a major role in how students react. My Spouse has been a teacher/administrator for nearly 50 years and knows how to engage the students without ““traumatizing” them.

I don’t see much difference between hiding under a desk (a useless exercise, in hindsight) and locking doors and moving to a safe area of a classroom.

There DOES need to be improvement in communicating an “active shooter” situation to teachers and students. Schools, in conjunction with local law enforcement, need to work on that.

But A-bombs or fire drill or active shooters — in the end there is not much difference except the active shooter drill may be the “real thing.”


Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/ybgj8uwf

2. http://tinyurl.com/yxqzomf8


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Active shooter

Monday, May 6, 2019

Opuscula

Don’t tell me
“I know what
You’re thinking”

THERE ARE A FEW TV COMMERCIALS that I mute as soon as I see the spokesperson.
I see the back of Tom Selleck and I press the mute button. It’s automatic and almost instantaneous.
Selleck is about to exclaim: “I know what you’re thinking.”
No, Tom, you do not know what I’m thinking.


I KNOW IT’S “JUST A COMMERCIAL,” but ever since I was young — OK, that was a long time ago — I have taken exception to people telling me

  • I know what you are thinking
  • I know what you want
  • You must see this or do that
There ARE things I feel I must do — pay taxes, keep my licenses updated, see my doctors regularly — but in the grand scheme of things, there are darn few things I must do, and I am certain that unless the actor on the other side of the tv screen’s glass is clairvoyant, there is no way he or she could know what crosses my mind as they tell me “I know what you’re thinking.”
I’m thinking I can go make a cup of coffee while the actor (when did actresses become actors) rattles on and on.
When I was a tyke, people told me when to go to bed, when to eat my gruel, etc. and so on.
When I was in the military — OK, it was only the Air Force, not “real” military — I was told when to go to bed, when to eat my gruel, etc.
Just as I was almost convinced that “somethings never change,” they do.
With my DD 214 in hand I knew I could start making my own decisions.
Pretty much, anyway.
If I caroused all night — I never caroused all night, probably because I often worked all night — and dragged in looking as if I HAD caroused all night, I could lose my job, but I could take the risk.
If I wanted eggs and grits for supper, I ate eggs and grits for supper. Likewise steak after work at 3 or 4 a.m.
    For those who need a translation, “supper” is the evening meal; “lunch” is the midday repast. “Breakfast” is, as the name implies, the meal to break (the sleep) “fast.” “Dinner,” according to the folks at Wikipedia usually refers to the most significant meal of the day, which can be at noon or in the evening. However, the term "dinner" can have different meanings depending on culture, as it may mean a meal of any size eaten at any time of day. Historically, it referred to the first meal of the day eaten around noon, and is still sometimes used for a noon-time meal, particularly if it is a large or main meal. In many parts of the Western world, dinner is taken as the evening meal.
I got used to the idea of being able to make my own decisions.
Now, despite being married for 40-plus years, I take umbrage when the likes of Tom Selleck tells me “I know what you’re thinking.”
I had some very close friends who told me I must see The Sound of Music. I’m certain the “hills are alive with the sound of music,” but I went to see My Fair Lady instead. There is a name for people such as me: contrarian. I wear it proudly, along with curmudgeon.
My point is, my obstinacy does not correlate to being “old.” (Can I write that about myself or does “old” fail the “political correctness” test along with “handicapped” (which I am) and cripple, blind, deaf, and mute. I long ago gave up on political correctness for skin tone and sexual preferences.)
    Skin tone also is a problem elsewhere. Blacks in Israel were known for generations as “Cushim,” people from the land of Cush1, believed to be Ethiopia. Then (mostly U.S.) politically correct people arrived and insisted that Cushim should be known as “sheHOrim” — “blacks” — not to be confused with similar-sounding sheKORim (drunks).
On the “political correctness” issue, I often call a younger male a “boy.” Never mind the person’s race — I assume “human” — any male younger than, say, 60, might be called “boy.” Females of the species are “girls” until they get within a decade of my age. No insult intended; it’s all relative (to my advanced years).
While I refrain from calling a girl (any age) by a pet name, e.g., sweetie, darlin’, I try not to reach for my lawyer’s phone number when a server (nee’ waitress) or cashier calls me “honey.” It’s a delightful Southern speech defect. It just doesn’t seem fair that I must carefully select my words while others are free to call me almost anything they fancy. I welcome “Dad” or “Daddy” from my daughter, “Pops” from my sons, and “Grandpa” from my grandchildren. I might accept those terms from youngsters, depending on how the words are expressed. Then again . . .



Sources
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cush_(Bible)
Above map from http://tinyurl.com/yy26h2vm


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on I know what you’re thinking

Sunday, May 5, 2019

Opuscula

TREASON

IF THE JERUSALEM (nee “Palestine”) POST IS CORRECT then Israelis need to consider treason in high places.

ACCORDING TO THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE POST, the IDF struck

  1. Several Hamas military compounds in the Gaza City neighborhoods of Tel Alawah and Shajiya used for training and manufacturing weapons.
  2. Targets belonging to Hamas’ naval force and a joint military compound used by Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PLO) in Beit Lahiya.
  3. Targets belonging to Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) including military compounds in Deir al-Balah, Tel Sultan, Shati and Khan Yunis.
  4. Two high-trajectory launchers, and several observation posts along the border
  5. A multi-story building in the Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City that Israel said was being used by the Hamas intelligence service. The building reportedly also housed the Gaza offices of Turkey’s Anadolu News Agency.
  6. A PIJ cross-border attack tunnel in the Rafiah area of the southern Gaza Strip which, according to IDF Spokesperson Brig.-Gen. Ronen Manelis, was intended by the group to be used to carry out a terrorist attack.
  7. Other targets included an underground Hamas rocket manufacturing facility, which the military said was “unique in its production abilities, and a mainstay of the organization’s ability to manufacture rockets.”
  8. The command center of Hamas’ Bureij troops, which included sites for manufacturing weapons.
  9. A military compound in Tel al-Hawa, which served as a training center for Hamas’ naval wing.
  10. Several military compounds in Jabalia, Shuja’iyya and Tel al-Hawa.
  11. Two Beit Lahia military compounds shared by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad were also targeted.
  12. Houses of Islamic Jihad commanders.

 

SOMEONE NEEDS TO ASK

If Israel — IDF commanders and their political masters — KNEW of these sites before Hamas once again broke cease-fire agreements, WHY didn’t Israel “eliminate” the targets before Israeli civilians and soldiers were endangered?

I will NOT accept as a satisfactory answer “Because of worldwide public opinion” or “Because the UN would criticize Israel” — the world and the UN do that anyway even when Israelis are murdered by terrorists.

One word comes to mind.

TREASON

Treason at government level. Treason at IDF command level.

This lack of pre-emptive strikes is as treasonous as Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s allowing the attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, despite ample evidence that the Japanese were planning the attack.

    2403 people — military and civilian — perished on the “Day that will live in infamy” (albeit all but forgotten by the current generation of Americans, already forgetting the 2,977 innocent Americans murdered by 19 Islamists on 9-11-2001).1

Fortunately for Israel, if not for its citizens, the attacks came only from Gaza; unlike the Yom Kippor attacks from multiple Muslim-dominated states.

However, akin to Yom Kippor, the Muslims of Hamas, the PLO, and PIJ opened their attack on the Jewish Shabat (Saturday). Unlike Kippor, incoming missiles loudly alerted the IDF so any surprise was short lived. Had the highly touted Israeli intelligence been awake, perhaps the attacks could have been stopped after the first series of missile launches.

It seems obvious to this scrivener that both government and military intelligence knew where the Hamas-PLO-PIJ targets were located; it is not reasonable to believe the IDF “discovered” the targets after the missiles began falling.

Israel just had an election and, basically, returned the same people who served in the previous governments.

Perhaps it is time for Likud, once a party of strong people, to rethink its current philosophy. Likud no longer is the party of Began and (David) Levy, men of decision and action. The current leader changes his direction more often than the wind and, in doing so, gives Israel’s enemies — both political (UN, leftists inside and outside Israel) and military (Hamas, PLO, PIJ, et al) — confidence to attack with impunity.

Israel does strike back, but at what cost? Loss of civilian lives and property. Loss of IDF lives.

Israel still cannot recover soldiers lost in previous battles.

Israel has reverted back to the days of Labor governments when Israel repeatedly was attacked by multiple enemies that, although it managed to prevail, always paid a high price.

 

GAZA, A UNIQUE PROBLEM

Both the IDF and the Egyptian military could go into Gaza and crush Hamas et al.

Thousand’s of civilians would be killed — “collateral damage.” That is unfortunate, but it is the price of war.

The real problem of Gaza is “Who is willing to control Gaza until it can establish a government that is willing to have peaceful relations with both Egypt and Israel?"

Neither country wants so take over Gaza, yet sans control by one, or both, countries, Gaza will slip back into the hands of despots and flunkies of Iran.

Gaza once had a thriving, growing economy. When Ariel Sharon kicked the Israelis out of Gaza, the local Muslims promptly destroyed the infrastructure, including profitable hot houses, and sent the strip’s economy into decline. It’s on-going battles with Israel, and to a lesser extant, Egypt, allowed Hamas to oust the PLO, itself never a valid peace partner, and to take a more aggressive stand against the one country that could, had it been allowed, have helped Gaza return to a reasonable economy.

    There are those who will argue that forcing Jews out of Gaza was Sharon’s second major mistake; the first being his “incursion” into Lebanon.

 

One final thought: It is almost noon on Sunday May 5th, 2019.

Aside from a few Israeli on-line “news” outlets, I have heard nothing — zero, nada — about the attacks on Israel civilians or missiles falling on Israeli communities. More interesting, I have heard very little about Israel’s retaliation against Hamas & friends. A mother and her baby were killed, but by what and by whom is questionable. For Hamas & friends, they are just (a) “collateral damage” and (b) good PR.

Why is the world silent?

Does “the world” finally realize that Hamas & friends are the instigators of death and destruction?

Doubtful.


1. 9-11-2001 was not “treason,” it was territorial stupidity on the part of government agencies, notably the FBI, that refused to share information that might have prevented the disaster.

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Treason

Thursday, May 2, 2019

Opuscula

Does political office
Make politicians
Deaf to all opinons?

FLORIDA IS ABOUT TO GIVE TRAINED teachers the option of volunteering to carry weapons to work.

Teachers in school districts that permit TRAINED teachers to be armed require that these volunteers undergo TRAINING before bringing a gun into a classroom and to continue ongoing TRAINING.

WHY AM I HARPING ON TRAINED AND TRAINING?

Because I read a local sheriff’s statement that he is against armed teachers since they will lack training.

    "There is no evidence that supports the notion that arming teachers would deter a shooter, while the threat posed by untrained individuals with guns in crisis situations is widely recognized."1
This sheriff, a former small-town police department sergeant, holds an opinion different than other sheriffs with substantially more experience.

To be fair to the new sheriff, he also is concerned that Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) responding to a school shooting won’t know WHO is the bad guy and who is the person protecting the students.

    Anyone who has a concealed carry permit and any training knows that when LEOs arrive on the scene, to put down the weapon and raise their hands. THAT, assuredly, would be part of the TRAINING the sergeant-to-sheriff contends school personnel will lack, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, chairman of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission, said he will ask the panel to recommend state law be changed so teachers who undergo background checks and extensive training will be allowed to have guns on campus as a last line of defense. (My son is LEO in Pinellas County although he is not a deputy.)

Gualtieri told The Associated Press he long believed only law enforcement personnel should carry guns at school, but his position "morphed" after studying other shootings and watching security video of the Feb. 14 Stoneman Douglas attack, which left 14 students and three staff members dead. 2

Hendry County Sheriff Steve Whidden is a proponent of armed school personnel.

The plan that Whidden said he developed is to identify multiple, capable volunteers at each school and allow them to carry concealed firearms at school.

    "Now, we're not simply going to hand out a firearm to school staff and place them in schools," he said.

    Those who volunteer would be given extensive background checks, psychological testing, and drug testing. Those who successfully pass the barrage of testing would also be put through a tactical active shooter course that Whidden said is more intense than required for active law enforcement personnel.3

Biographies of the two sheriffs at
    Gualtieri, http://tinyurl.com/y4zct6sg
    Whidden, http://tinyurl.com/y2lmemu2

The Dade County and Broward County school district superintendents have decided to opt out of the option to allow school personnel to carry weapons.

Parents of students murdered in the Stoneman Douglas shooting are of mixed emotions.

Manuel Oliver, who lost his son, Joaquin, said that

    "I never thought that was a good idea when I heard it the first time," he said. "We keep bringing solutions that will protect our kids from the next shooter, so we assume there will be a next shooter and we don’t do anything about that." 1
At the risk of being insensitive, it seems to this scrivener that allowing school personnel to carry weapons — AFTER testing and training, IS doing something about it.

Andrew Pollack, who lost his daughter, Meadow, in the shooting believes differently. He applauds the measure and told Local 10 News that it's an additional layer of security.

    "Anyone that can go through it — like I said — a lunch lady, a crossing guard, any teacher, a gym teacher — anyone that wants to volunteer and go through that intense training and actually pass would be an asset to have at a school.1

Both Dade County and Broward County have suffered too many school shootings. Fortunately the number injured or killed is low, unlike Stoneman Douglas in Parkland (Broward County) Florida.

Having LEOs at the gates apparently fails to prevent attacks on students. There was at least one sheriff’s deputy on duty at Stoneman Douglas when the shooter walked into the school with a rifle. (The deputy was fired and the sheriff removed from office by the state’s new governor.)

Based on personal experience, a person never knows how he or she will react when put into a position where they might take a life. Will the person hesitate and lose his or her own life? Will others escape in the interim? Will someone else who is armed “take out” the attacker?

Will a person who was in a military combat unit be more inclined to shoot than a person who has no combat experience? Even LEOs can hesitate; sometimes at the cost of their lives.

On the other hand, will a potential attacker avoid a school where the attacker knows it is likely the attacker will die before he or she is finished?

Knowing there are armed and trained personnel around, but not knowing WHO is armed might give a potential attacker second thoughts.

Have “Sky Marshals” on planes reduced the number of high jacking attempts?

There is no way to provide 100% protection for anyone at any place. The best for which we can hope is to reduce the probability of an attack by making the probability of success minimal.

Trained and armed school personnel may be part of the answer to making schools safer.


Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/y4yxdt4u

2. http://tinyurl.com/yxwjbwjw

3. http://tinyurl.com/yy4twgjc

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Politician’s deafness

Wednesday, May 1, 2019

Opuscula

Is BDS free speech
Or hate speech
If it’s “selective”?

IN THE UNITED STATES CITIZENS are very protective of their First Amendment “Free Speech” rights.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. 1
It is the SECOND Amendment that gives Americans the right to keep firearms and the government the right to regulate them.

While is IS illegal to “yell fire in a crowded theater,” — that endangers public safety — is it illegal for an organization to promote a boycott of a country ?

If I want to boycott goods from China — which I do — and I tell whoever reads my rants that I “don’t buy Chinese” for several reasons, does that equate to the international Boycott, Divest, and Sanction (BDS) movement against Israel?

    The sad thing is, the BDSers are hurting the people they claim they are helping — the people living in PLO-controlled areas — since “BDSing” Israel takes jobs away from these people who come into Israel to work and receive wages far in excess of what they would make “at home.”

Muslims from the PLO-controlled areas had good jobs with SodaStream; their salaries were the same as Israeli’s salaries for the same job. BDS caused SodaStream to relocate its business and the Muslims from the PLO areas lost their jobs.

RETURNING TO THE REAL QUESTION, is my personal BDS against China protected by the Constitution?

Is the BDS sponsored by an international organization protected by the Constitution?

    CAVEAT: I am not a lawyer or Constitutional scholar nor do I teach Constitutional law at a university.
To my simple mind, there IS a difference between an individual (this scrivener) encouraging people to forego purchasing Chinese products for very specific reasons 2 and an international organization that pressures governments to reject a nation’s products because of claims repeatedly proven untrue. 3

The Constitution gives Congress — not individual citizens — the right to regulate international and interstate commerce.

    Article I, Section 8, Paragraphs 1-3 of the United States Constitution:
    The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and to promote the general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
    To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
    To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes.
BDSers are, in my opinion, trying to override the U.S. Constitution when they attempt to convince local and state governments to restrict trade with a political entity (Israel) they demonize, especially when their claims are so easily debunked by on-the-spot observations. (Would BDSers actually travel to Israel and the PLO-controlled areas to SEE FOR THEMSELVES the reality on the ground?)

Do I violate the U.S. Constitution by pointing out WHY I don’t want to “buy Chinese” and suggest that others consider my reasoning.

    I Do “buy Chinese” where there is (a) no alternative or (b) I was not aware of a product’s country of origin until it arrived on my doorstep.

HOW DO I KNOW what goes on in Israel? Been there, done that.

I saw an obviously Muslim family strolling on a Haifa beach as missiles fired by Muslims fell near the city.

I have seen Arabs working in supermarkets and in businesses, sometimes along side non -Muslims (there are Christians as well as Jews and Muslims in Israel), and sometimes at their own businesses — unlike in the PLO-areas from which Jews are banned, Muslims can, and do, own businesses in Israel.

My late Mother-In-Law had a Muslim caretaker and was treated by a Muslim doctor – in Israel.

My sister-in-law goes to a Muslim dentist – in Israel.

I have seen obviously Muslim families pass through airport security without interference and I have seen Jews forced to unpack their luggage for inspectors before moving on – in Israel.

So much for the BDSer’s “discrimination” allegations.

While I seriously doubt the question of “Is BDS constitutional” ever will be raised before the U.S. Supreme Court, it does present an interesting question.

A simpler question is “Is BDS free speech or hate speech.”

For this scrivener, there is a simple answer: Yes, BDS IS hate speech.


Sources

1 https://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

2 Why avoid Chinese products?
   (a) Lack of QA/QC
   (b) History of selling dangerous products
   (c) History of selling feces-laced foods (fish, mushrooms)
   (d) History of selling counterfeit drugs that are either/both dangerous or lack the required potency (via Canada)
   (e) Employment conditions that are reported to be intolerable.

3. BDSers claim
   (a) Israel is an apartheid state, yet Muslims (1) Are on the nation’s Supreme Court, (2) In the Knesset, (3) Can live anywhere (unlike the PLO areas where a Jew cannot go), (4) Ride all public transportation, (5) Shop at all stores and markets
   (b) Muslims are discriminated against (see 3(a), above) and lack the freedoms enjoyed by non-Muslim Israelis, except they walk on Haifa’s beaches unmolested while rockets from Lebanon and Syria fall in Haifa fields
   (c) Muslims are paid less than non-Muslims doing the same work except at SodaStream and Rami Levy supermarkets and most Israeli businesses that cater to Muslim and non-Muslim customers.

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on BDS as Hate Speech