Thursday, February 27, 2020

Opuscula

Candidates’ fans
Sit on their hands;
Watch their faces

NEXT TIME YOU SEE A POLITICAL CANDIDATE — any candidate of any party for any office — LOOK AT THE FACES of the people sitting behind the candidate.

MOST of the time, these “supporters” have blank or at least unenthusiastic expressions.


Screen capture of Elizabeth Warren rally with, one assumes, supporters behind her. Look closely at the faces.

CANDIDATES LIKE TO know their supporters “have got their backs.”

It might be a good idea if the candidates actually looked at the faces and watched the emotions of the folks who “have their backs” as they rally their fans in front of them.

The boredom on the faces of Ms. Warren’s backdrop (above) are more typical than not, and they are not limited to this candidate.

The candidates may — usually — have enthusiastic people in front of them and as they enter a venue site, but the folks sitting behind the candidate often seem lethargic, as if they are waiting for a cue card to descend from the ceiling telling them to applaud or otherwise show some emotion.

Watching some of the background victims a viewer almost expects someone to pick his nose or scratch where he could if he was in his own home.

    Give me that place
    Called home sweet home
    It’s better by far than riches
    ’Cause when you’re in your own sweet home
    You can scratch anyplace it itches

While the folks in front of the candidate seem enthusiastic, the enthusiasm fails to extend behind the podium.

Perhaps the candidates’ workers should screen potential “back benchers” in a way similar to tv game shows screen potential players — a lack of real or faux enthusiasm and the potential back bencher gets the hook.



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Candidates’ fans

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Opuscula

Must everything be
All white or all black?
Where are the grays?

 

BERNIE SANDERS, who by his own admission is a Democrat Socialist — more leftist Democrat or Socialist? — is being taken to task by Republicans for stating a fact: Fidel Castro made education a focal point of his regime.

Although I am not a fan of Sen. Sanders, what he said about Castro is true.

Sen. Sanders, to the best of my knowledge, never said Castro was a nice guy or that his government was good to, or for, the Cuban people.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO FIND SOMETHING positive to say about almost anyone.

    Tomás de Torquemada, Hitler, and Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer are notable exceptions to that generality.

It may not be popular among Democrats, but President Trump HAS improved the economy and HAS reduced unemployment and HAS brought back jobs to the U.S.

It may not be popular among Republicans, but ex-president Obama DID push through a health plan and DID bring about the destabilizing Arab Spring that toppled governments throughout the Middle East.

 

Gray (grey) areas

Rarely is anyone 100 percent this or 100% that.

There always are “exceptions to the rule” that muddy our perceptions.

Given the reality of this, why are we so quick to condemn someone who even suggests that someone might have a redeeming feature?

In Israel, there are many who claim that all “Palestinians” just want to murder Israelis. Yet, during forest fire season, “Palestinians” help Israelis put out fires. It doesn’t make the headlines, but it happens. On the other side of the coin, there are “Palestinians” who are taught all Israelis are monsters, when in reality many “Palestinian” lives are saved in Israeli hospitals.

    Since, unlike the “Palestinians,” Israelis include Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others, equating “Israelis” only with “Jews” is not accurate.

 

Sensationalizing the norm

The media, left, right, and in between, seems to have slipped from reporting the facts sans emotion to sensationalizing almost everything.

It IS what is said — written — and HOW it is written that determines how a reasonable reader responds.

I doubt any internet gazetteer can write a “straight” news story sans hyperbole. The “right” is no better or worse than the “left.” There seems to be no “middle” when it comes to politics. Even this blog if given a close read will show a slight bias.

Perhaps we have become accustomed to what used to be called “tabloid headlines.” Not necessary accurate, but bound to get the potential reader’s attention. Most of us get our “news” from tv that mimics the tabloids.

 

Half truths

Worse, by far, than tabloid headlines are one-sided reports. Half truths are no better than full lies.

Police shoot man in front of his house

The headline may be 100 percent accurate, but what is missing is WHY the cops fired their guns.

Even in the “old days” of real newspapers where headline writers were limited by available space, good editors demanded honest headlines.

    As a newspaper man I used to break my head getting headlines to fit AND be complete. I loved the challenge.

We are cursed with poorly written biased headlines and poorly written biased “news” copy.

We are left with half-truths and distortions of facts.

Fidel Castro WAS a dictator who owed the U.S. for its help over-throwing the Batista regime. (So much for “influencing elections.”)

John Kennedy put an embargo in place to prevent importation of Cuban products … AFTER he laid in a large supply of his favorite Cuban cigars.

There used to be a radio program featuring Paul Harvey (right). Mr. Harvey always ended the program with the comment “Now you know (pause) the rest of the story.

Sen., Sanders was correct in his statement about Castro. A good reporter should have dug a little bit to find out what else the senator said about the despot. That would have provided a complete story to make Paul Harvey proud.





PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Where are the grays?

Monday, February 24, 2020

Opuscula

Canon: Japanese
Company losing
Product quality


BACK IN THE DAY, c 1960, Japanese products were only slightly better than today’s Chinese products. Like the Chinese, the Japanese stole most ideas, but improved upon them.

U.S. companies such as Honeywell did incoming QC on Japanese products associated with their name. I had a Honeywell Pentax H3v 35mm SLR that performed well for several decades until supplanted by digital cameras.

Over the years I have bought or been given a number of Canon products.

I bought a new, brass Canon F-1. Good 50mm f/1.2 lens, great 20mm wide angle, and disappointing 135mm. I added a second hand FtB. Both cameras are still “at the ready.” Neither had a wealth of “electronics.”

Later I bough a Canon video camera (lots of electronics) that failed when I needed it most.

My Second Born gave me a Canon PowerShot SD1100IS digi-cam with a plastic lens. It’s OK for scenics, but anything closer than a yard is not worth printing.

My Daughter decided the camera on her phone was more convenient than a Canon SX30 IS digital SLR. (Lots of electronics.) The camera gathers dust in my closet. I am used to controlling shutter speed, aperture, focus — the SX30 wants to do it all for me. There is one more camera in the closet, a 4*5 (inch) technical camera; absolutely nothing automatic about it. It’s a problem on a windy day, but I do love the thing.

Since most of my experience with Canon optics was good, I thought Canon printers also would be good.

I’ve used, sometimes owned, different home office printers. Most have been multi-function: print, scan, and sometimes fax. (My carrier, Consumer Cellular, does everything I want except send and receive faxes. Fortunately, there are work-arounds.)

I had, for perhaps 10 years, a Canon MP 560 multi-function printer.

It scanned, albeit sans automatic document feeder (ADF).

It printed everything I wanted to print, including envelopes. Open a slot on the back, slide in some envelopes, and, as “The Great One” (Jackie Gleason) was wont to exclaim, “Off we go.” No special settings on the printer.

But it got old and would have cost more to fix than to replace.

I bought a Canon MX 922 multi-function device.

It printed. It scanned — and had a document feeder (ADF) to make my scanned pages straighter.

But to print envelopes, the paper had to be removed from the single feeder tray and cheap plastic sliders re positioned.

In the beginning the MP 560 still was nearby so I used it for envelopes.

With the demise of the MP 560, I was forced to use the MX 922 for everything.

That didn’t last long.

The cheap plastic positioners broke and a spring “disappeared.” I still could use the printer for scanning and printing full-size pages.

Then something went wrong and the printing function failed.

I RT*M’ed and tried everything Canon recommended to no avail.

Naturally all failures happened out of warranty.

Needing a printer that could actually PRINT, I bought a Canon TR4520.

Another packaging failure

An aside.

I once worked for a company that made mid-size computers, and later a company that made telephony equipment (or maybe vice versa). Both had the same problem.

Both bought good looking cabinets for their gear; neither left room for cabling inside the cabinet. (The telecom company also made a product that lacked a common ground. I mentioned this to the Italian engineer who designed the thing and he told me it a ground was not needed. He also told my boss that this uppity tech writer needed to be chastised and I was. Later, in a demo to a prospective customer, the ungrounded machine sparked and nailed a guy’s metal frame glasses. The machine quickly got a common ground.)

Envelopes vs. software

Akin to the disassembly required to print an envelop in the MX 922, the Canon TR4520 forces the user to remove all paper from the single paper tray, slide some cheap plastic guides into place and then, with envelopes or photo paper in place, to make the software “think” it has an envelop try installed.

The error message on the printer tells the use to “insert cassette 1871.”

There is NO “cassette” to install.

Check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the printer’s site.

Also no “cassette 1871.”

Not only is the printer mechanical design (packaging) bad, the support information is lousy.

I did find a PDF manual that instructed me how to make the printer accept standard #9 envelopes.

I even got the printer to print an envelope.

Unfortunately the positioning of the text on the envelop made it a waste of time and paper.

LibreOffice Writer was used to feed the printer and it was set for #9 envelopes. (The OS was MS 10). LibreOffice may be part of the problem.

Now I’m REALLY frustrated

Having been forced to hand-scrawl addresses on several envelopes, I decided to put the printer to work printing a standard page.

I discovered that I have to reset software to 8*10.

Did that.

When I sent a page to print, I was told to insert that (expletive deleted) cassette again. Why? 8*10 is NOT an envelop.

I tried to set the machine for plain paper.

Insert cassette.

Turned off the machine for a minute, thinking the software would clear to default.

No.

Unplugged the machine while this is being keyed.

Returned to default?

No.

Despite following the on-line manual — that did NOT agree with the dark two-line “display” on the printer — I failed to clear the problem initiated when I tried to print a #9 envelop.

IN THE END I reinstalled the driver software, made the “Copy 1” the default and removed the original software.

The printer now works, but it will be the last Canon anything I buy. There are too many competitive options in the TR4520’s price range to suffer software that is poorly documented and a company that lacks real — even if off in Never-Never Land where English a barely understood — customer support.

 

I am so old I remember when customer support actually WAS. I also remember when a software product came with a real, paper, manual.

The excuse for on-line manuals, aside from being “cheap” is that they could be quickly updated and disseminated when a product was updated (or when an error was discovered in the manual — it happens).

My Second Born works with computers. His clients range from small business networks to little old ladies. He even helps out his old man via TeamViewer, an application that lets him “massage” my computer from his house.

My “bottom line:” Rather than swear at Canon products I’ll “swear off” Canon products.

My old F-1 had a small user’s manual and, although it hardly is “point-n-shoot” similar to Kodak’s Hawkeye of the 1950s, it was simple to operate.

I don’t want to go back to a mimeograph machine (c 1960), but a reliable printer that just worked would be great. Bring back the old MP 560. It worked.

It was made of stronger stuff than the MX 922. It accommodated envelopes without having to reset anything. (In 20-20 hindsight I might have been better off paying to have the MP 560 refurbished. The only problem would be finding a steady supply of ink. Like parts for a car, as the device ages, parts are harder to find.)

Meanwhile, I will work on my handwriting. It used to be legible, “back in the day.”



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Canon Quality

Sunday, February 23, 2020

Opuscula

LBJ to Bloomberg:
Has nothing
Been accomplished?

 

FROM LBJ TO BLOOMBERG, promises of equality. LBJ actually did something positive; why is Bloomberg offering more of the same?

Where is the “disconnect” between LBJ in 1964 and Bloomberg in 2020? Why is yet another “equality” program needed? Isn’t 56 years enough time to “catch up”?

According to the Associated Press (https://tinyurl.com/vse2axp),

    Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg made a pitch to African American voters before the national holiday honoring Martin Luther King Jr., visiting a black church in Tulsa, the site of a race massacre nearly 100 years ago that left hundreds dead and the city’s thriving African American community in rubble.

    The former New York City mayor spoke out against racial income inequality and outlined an economic proposal aimed at increasing the number of black-owned homes and businesses. The plan includes a $70 billion investment in the nation’s most disadvantaged neighborhoods.

    “I do believe the next president has to make the issue of economic inequality a top priority, and there’s no better place for me to talk about it than right here in Greenwood,” Bloomberg told parishioners Sunday at the Vernon African Methodist Episcopal Church.

    Bloomberg described the initiative as a “plan for righting what I think are historic wrongs and creating opportunity and wealth in black communities.”

 

The history.com website (https://tinyurl.com/y6b3hjxp) notes that Lyndon Baines Johnson created the “Great Society” in 1964.

    In March 1964, Johnson introduced the Office of Economic Opportunity and the Economic Opportunity Act during a special message to Congress. He’d hoped to help the underprivileged break the poverty cycle by helping them develop job skills, further their education and find work.

    To do this, he created a Job Corps for 100,000 disadvantaged men. Half would work on conservation projects and the other half would receive education and skills training in special job training centers.

    In addition, Johnson tasked state and local governments with creating work training programs for up to 200,000 men and women. A national work study program was also established to offer 140,000 Americans the chance to go to college who could otherwise not afford it.

    Other initiatives the so-called War on Poverty offered were:

    • a Community Action program for people to tackle poverty within their own communities
    • the ability for the government to recruit and train skilled American volunteers to serve poverty-stricken communities
    • loans and guarantees for employers who offered jobs to the unemployed
    • funds for farmers to purchase land and establish agricultural co-ops
    • help for unemployed parents preparing to enter the workforce

Beyond these programs, LBJ’s administration also brought

  • Medicare for all and Medicaid for the indigent
  • Head Start and Education Reform
  • Urban Renewal

With all the programs available, why, 56 years later, does Bloomberg need to promise more of the same?

When will it end?

 

How long will it take?

By comparison, the State of Israel was declared in May, 1948.

It was immediately attacked by Muslim states which it managed to fend off.

Since then Israel has, despite other wars and constant terror attacks, managed to become the technological leader in the Middle East.

It has absorbed people from around the world, people of color as well as whites.

These immigrants, some from what most Americans would term “primitive” cultures with little modern education, have been integrated into Israeli society, partly through government assistance but largely through their own efforts.

Some of these immigrants have risen to high positions in government, the military, and education.

What is the difference between the people whose disadvantages President Johnson set the government to eliminate and, say, an immigrant from Ethiopia or Yemen?

To be absolutely honest, neither the Ethiopians nor the Yemenites were warmly welcomed by the Euro-Jews in Israel, but by their own effort, they overcame the disadvantages.

LBJ’s Great Society, if Bloomberg’s claims are correct, is a failure.

According to Bloomberg advertisements, only Bloomberg can be credited for any advancements in education and job opportunities.

New York, New York, a hell of a town.


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on LBJ to Bloomberg

Friday, February 14, 2020

Enterprise Risk Management, BC, COOP

Blame woes
On imaginary
“Black Swan”

 

AN ARTICLE IN ENGLAND'S The Guardian with the headline Businesses worldwide count cost of coronavirus outbreak (https://tinyurl.com/vc3t3yv) quoted the boss of China’s biggest listed company, Alibaba, as describing the coronavirus outbreak as a “black swan” event that could have a significant economic impact.

 

”Black Swan” No.

Peking Duck, maybe.

Incompetent risk management planning: ABSOLUTELY.

 

Black Swan defined

According to England-based The Business Continuity Institute, a “Black Swan” is an event that strikes as a surprise, with a high impact on those affected. The Black Swan Theory was coined by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in 2007 and it revolutionised the way organizations think about risk management and forecasting.(https://tinyurl.com/r4zo5gg)

One of the main messages the author tried to convey is that current risk models are not efficient enough and hard-to-predict disasters can occur due to lack of perspective, the article continued.

I was, for many years, a risk management practitioner, I even was certified by The Business Continuity Institute (BCI), despite having some severe philosophical problems with it.

“Black swans” was one of the issues on which The BCI and I parted ways.

 

 

Practitioner’s cop out

To this scrivener, a “Black Swan” is a cop out. It shows the practitioner held too narrow a “perspective” — which may have been determined by the client — and a pathetic lack of knowledge of history.

 

Are rapidly spreading diseases something new in 2020? World War I claimed an estimated 16 million lives between 1914 and 1918. The influenza epidemic (H1N1) that swept the world in 1918 killed an estimated 50 million people. (https://tinyurl.com/j27npgb)

There is plenty of recent history of rapidly-spreading disease.

A quick search of the WWW turns up a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. CDC) page titled Influenza (Flu) Past Outbreaks. (https://tinyurl.com/yx5l2h5r)

So where is the “Black Swan”?

 

Absences by the thousands

All along the supply chain, deliveries are interrupted.

Quarantines by governments stop or delay shipments.

Absences of personnel disrupt deliveries.

Vendors’ vendors fail to meet service level agreements..

Vendors fail to meet their customers’ service level agreements.

Sales personnel either are absent or quarantined to a specific locale.

Manufacturing slows or stops for lack of raw materials and personnel to turn these raw materials into product.

Office staffs are reduced to skeletons so A/R and A/P are delayed.

Finished products remain on the shelf.

Customers cannot sell products they don’t have (the manufacturer being a vendor).

Dominoes.

Every time there has been an epidemic, the supply chain takes a hit. The more wide-spread the epidemic, the longer the duration of the epidemic, the greater the impact.

Has this scenario ever played out before?

Yes, yes, and yes again.

So where is the “Black Swan”?

 

Narrow perspective

Too many practitioners are little more than IT Disaster Recovery people with a new title: “Business Continuity.”

Even many Business Continuity planners think only in terms of facility.

There HAS been some interest in supply chains, but this interest usually terminates at the critical vendors.

I was fortunate to work for American Express on a contract basis many years past. The Amex group for which I was engaged utilized vendors for almost everything.

One of the things I recommended, and my Amex boss agreed, was to have each vendor provide Amex with the vendor’s business continuity plan. Amex realized that a few vendors had good plans, a few not so good plans. Each plan was critiqued and the critique returned to the vendors. Amex knew which vendors could be expected to meet their service level agreement “no matter what,” and which vendors needed a secondary (alternate) vendor as backup.

 

Playing the “What if?” game

If a practitioner is thorough, that person will talk with everyone in the profit center and ask: What if? What could possibly go wrong?

This works best with groups of people; one idea generates another. No idea is too far fetched. (That’s why planners have risk vs. probability charts.)

Practitioners who think, having done one plan for a customer in Enterprise A that they know everything there is to know about ALL Enterprise A organizations need to be disabused of this faulty notion “yesterday.” Like snowflakes, no two are alike.

 

Ubiquitous other

When we worked together, my friend and IT guru, Ace Jackson would be amused that all of my risk lists included at the end: “ubiquitous other.”

The risk may have been a “Black Swan,” but since we were looking at the entire operation and what might happen if a risk we failed to consider occurred, we still were confident that the organization had mitigated “whatever it is” and could recover from “whatever it was” based on The Plan, The Training, and The Plan Maintenance.

My “ubiquitous other” may have been, strictly speaking a “Black Swan” it still would not be able to impact the organization the way the coronavirus has impacted many of Alibaba’s customers.

 

Black swan? It’s a lazy practitioner’s cop out.



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Black Swans

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Opuscula

Divisions, chasms:
Can Americans
Return to civility?

THANKS LARGELY TO HILLARY CLINTON and progressive Democrats in the U.S. House of Representative on one side, a number of obstinate Republicans in the Senate on the other, and presidents who put egos ahead of the country, the U.S. has been fragmented as it now only a few times in the past.

Is there hope Americans can overcome these divisions?

 

Cartoon: elephant and donkey stretching “American” apart; man saying “I don’t think I can stretch much farther”

 

THIS IS NOT THE FIRST time the nation has been divided.

At its birth there were those who wanted to remain subject to England’s royalty and some who wanted independence.

When the industrial age came to the northern states, a movement gained momentum to free the slaves in the south. It might have happened anyway over time, but a war was fought not over slavery but for freedom from Washington. President Lincoln emancipated — by presidential fiat — the south’s slaves in 1862; the war had been in progress since April 12, 1861.

    On September 22, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that as of January 1, 1863, all slaves in the states currently engaged in rebellion against the Union “shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.”

    Lincoln didn’t actually free any of the approximately 4 million men, women and children held in slavery in the United States when he signed the formal Emancipation Proclamation the following January. The document applied only to enslaved people in the Confederacy, and not to those in the border states that remained loyal to the Union. (https://tinyurl.com/ycnr8hgk) Lincoln’s sole intent was that the slaves should rise up against their masters.

Fortunately, despite a few crazies on each side, America has not again fallen into a state of “hot” warfare, but the schism between right and left is reminiscent of the “cold” war between the U.S. and the former USSR.

There are painful remnants of America’s civil war extant. Consider the oft-heard name “War of Southern Independence” to refer to “Mr. Lincoln’s war.”

Yet this conflict officially ended in April, 1865, nearly 155 years ago as this is keyed.

No matter who wins in 2020, America loses

No matter if President Trump wins another term or a Democrat replaces him in the White House, he, or she, will be hard pressed to succeed in anything.

If the House remains in control of the Democrats — who seem to have surrendered to the party’s “progressives,” nothing a Republican president can propose will be found acceptable.

If a Democrat moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., a Republican Senate will stand ready too thwart any proposal.

Should either party win the White House, the Senate, and the House, perhaps the country will move forward, but possibly only for a few years. Neither party is going to go away or change its stripes. If anything, the parties’ leadership — and that term is used loosely — will, like Pharaoh, harden its heart to the people’s wishes.

Mr. Rogers for president

This country does not need a decent 5¢ cigar (https://tinyurl.com/qvjwkth), it needs civility. It needs a simplex radio mentality: I talk, you listen; you talk, I listen. We cannot “talk over” one another. Similar to email: you send, I receive; I reply, you receive.

 

Cartoon: donkey & elephant head-to-head with man asking “Please, is there no room for civil discourse?”

 

In addition to preventing shouting matches, it also may provide time for both sides to consider, calmly and rationally, what the other is proposing.

What we need is civility, courtesy, a genteel approach a la the late Fred McFeely Rogers.

It’s used to be OK for a politician to denigrate an opponent within the confines of the Oval Office as presidents Harry S Truman and Richard M. Nixon are said to have done, but today, with malcontents at the ready to report both fact and fiction to the media, this is not the case.

Before (anti-)social media, a politician of import either thought — or had someone to think for him/her — before promulgating a slur on an opponent or idea.

Also “before (anti-)social media,” people had time to fact check (or have “facts” checked for them) before shooting from the lip or the tips of the fingers.

If we can’t have Fred Rogers, perhaps Alfred E. Neuman — What? Me worry? — would do on an interim basis. Someone who won’t take umbrage on every real or imagined slight.

 

TWO FAMOUS FACES: Mr. Rogers and Alfred E. Neuman

 

Pogo was right

It is not only the liberals, in all their incarnations, nor the conservatives in their many variations, it is all of us who fail to proffer basic courtesies to one another,

Walt Kelly’s Pogo (right) was correct when he opined “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Until we, as a nation, regain civility toward one another, the chasm will only widen.

With physical attacks increasing due to philosophical differences, we are left with only a few options:

    Return to civility
    Anarchy
    Civil war

Only one of those options can keep America great.

It is said that Jerusalem fell to the Babylonians because the Jews abandoned the commandments and once, to the Romans, because of internal dissension. Is there a Rome waiting in the wings for Americans to destroy their own country from within?

Many great nations have risen, fallen, and disappeared. Will America be next?



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

No comments:

Sunday, February 9, 2020

Opuscula

Presidential
Presumptions

INCUMBENT PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP presents his Middle east “peace plan” that forget to ask what the PEOPLE in the plan want.

Presidential contender Mike Bloomberg is going to “Get it done,” even if the people to whom “it” will be done don’t want it.

TRUMP, TO THE DEMOCRATS’ lingering embarrassment, offered what the media termed the “Plan of the Century.” A plan to shuffle Israeli towns to create an artificial “country” to be called “Palestine.”

Admittedly Trump did not consult the PLO leadership.

He tried, but Abu Mazen rejected contact; even refusing a phone call from Trump.

The leftist media, of course, only reported that Trump never talked to Abu Mazen. A half-truth is as bad as a lie.

Trump and his representatives also never talked to the people in the communities that would be most effected by his proposal.

 

Because we say so

The plan calls for several Arab-dominated communities in Israel to be transferred by Trump fiat to the PLO.

The problem is that the Israeli Arab citizens of those communities WANT to remain Israeli citizens.

Several polls have indicated the majority of these communities’ citizens want to keep their Israeli citizenship.

But “polls” always are of questionable value.

What needs to be done is to hold a plebiscite to determine the will of the majority of the residents in those communities. The election could be monitored by representatives from Israel and from the PLO, or from the U.S. and Russia, both of which are experienced at influencing elections.

Trump also did not ask the Israelis in the Sinai if they want to have Hamas terrorists living next to them. (He obviously did not speak with Hamas leaders since, like Abu Mazen, they only talk to Iran’s “Supreme Leader,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.) There is no indication that Trump consulted with the Egyptians before expanding Hamas rule over more land along the Egyptian border.

Egypt, in order to deter Hamas’ air attacks, cleared a wide swath of land on which Hamas balloons, kites, and other items can land sans damage to property or crops.

 

Pipe dream

Part of the plan is to “demilitarize” the future “Palestine” and, as part of “Palestine,” Gaza.

Who will guarantee that “Palestine” will be demilitarized?

Who will guarantee “Palestine’s” defense from its neighbors?

There is talk of an airport in Gaza. There IS an airport in Gaza: Arafat International.

It was ruined in retaliation for attacks on Israel and to reduce war materiels from entering Gaza by air.

What guarantee will Israel have that “demilitarized” Gaza won’t be the same, albeit on a smaller scale, as was a demilitarized nazi Germany. Does anyone REMEMBER nazi Germany?

 

Healthcare at what cost?

Bloomberg is going to give us healthcare a la Obama (who is endorsing him).

“Medicare for all.” (Amusing that Obama won’t endorse his own vice president.)

OK; will everyone then pay what Medicare beneficiaries pay into Medicare every month? What about co-pays?

This scrivener’s Spouse works and pays into Medicare. She also is a Medicare recipient and pays her monthly fee. For her, Medicare is double jeopardy.

I never understood: I paid into Medicare from Day 1. Now, as a recipient, I STILL pay into Medicare?

If a Medicare-like plan is put into place, will people be obliged to see their personal physician on a regular schedule for “preventive medicine”?

Regular, candid, visits with primary care physicians and nurses DO reduce emergency room visits and reduce hospital stays. The military has known this for decades.

No one knows what the Trump health care plan would be like since the Democrats blocked it at every turn. Is Bloomberg’s plan Obamacare on steroids or is it closer to what Trump tried to implement?

 

More jobs, higher pay

Bloomberg promises to create jobs (as Trump has done) and to raise pay. Great.

Does anyone consider what a raise in pay sans increased responsibility causes?

Raised pay means higher prices (higher cost of living for everyone).

Raised pay means fewer jobs as employers cut costs (that, bottom line, increase owner/share holder profits).

My first few jobs paid minimum wage — then $1/hour — but I could buy gasoline for anywhere from 17 cents/gallon (gas “wars”) to 50 cents/gallon. Milk and bread were much less than a dollar and cigarettes went for 50 cents/pack from a machine. Newspapers from a rack were a dime weekdays and 25 cents on Sundays.

But higher pay is a good election promise. In the end it is meaningless, as it drives up the cost-of-living, but it SOUNDS good.

 

Making America safer

Reasonable gun control needs to be implemented.

Is it “reasonable” for a privately-owned rifle to have a 30-round magazine? Why would a hunter need THIRTY ROUNDS to kill one animal? Even a lousy shooter should be able to bring down the target with two or three rounds.

True, there never is a LEO (Law Enforcement Officer, cop) when you need one. My First Born, a LEO, frequently reminds me of that fact.

So let’s say a person buys a firearm for home defense. Is that person expecting a fire fight, something out of a war movie? A 10-round magazine for a rifle or pistol should be enough. If not, buy another 10-round magazine.

(My revolver holds seven rounds but for safety, I only load 6 rounds. If I can’t hit my target with 6 rounds, I’ll throw the gun at my attacker.)

I see no reason for noise suppressors/silencers. Maybe in the world of James Bond they are sexy, but in the real world where most of us live, there is no justification.

 

Get serious about background checks

Background checks? Absolutely; serious checks using on local and national databases. The state did a cursory check when I bought my first side arm. When I applied for a concealed carry license, the check was much more stringent.

No more instant delivery for guns bought at a gun show. Gun show purchases must be the same as gun store purchases.

Still, until gun laws are enforced, what’s the use?

Most criminals who committed crimes with guns did not buy their weapons at the local gun store.

It is not xenophobic to believe a lot of crime is committed by illegal immigrants. If a person is illegal, he or she may have a hard time finding a liberal scofflaw to hire them, and then cheat them on their wages. The alternative: crime.

Meanwhile, why are the scofflaws — the illegals’ employers — allowed to go free with, worst case, a “slap on the wrist”? Punish them with the inconvenience of jail time, 30 days minimum. Then led the Feds add money penalties for lack of I-9 forms.

 

Silence kills

Many of the recent spate of school shootings have been at the hands of students. Many of these shooters’ plans were obvious long before the murders. Social media were ignored. Classroom behavior was ignored. Psychological warnings (e.g., tormenting weaker kids, animal cruelty) were dismissed. When there WAS information, it often was not shared. The FBI is notorious for failing to share information with locals.

Making America safer is not just about gun control; that is only a small part of the effort.

What cannot be legislated in the feeling of entitlement many criminals possess. Why else would someone kill another for a pair of sneakers or car hubcaps. Why else would young people with semi-automatic rifles randomly shoot at houses in their own neighborhoods?

People hit the streets and call for their neighbors to “see something, say something,” to work with LEOs to get the killers off the streets, but in the end, rarely does anyone say anything, especially to the LEOs.

Is there anything any president can do to instill respect for others?

Parents, for whatever reasons, have abrogated responsibility for their child’s behavior.

Schools have failed.

LEOs look the other way at minor crimes.

Courts either will not, or cannot sentence juveniles for their crimes.

I’m entitled to that gold chain you stupidly are flashing; give it to me or ...



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment Presidential Presumptions

Friday, February 7, 2020

Opuscula

Taurus 692
Revisited
After some use

 

I HAVE A TAURUS MODEL 692 revolver.

The gun is made in Brasilcq for the Miami-based company.

The Model 692 replaced a Taurus 605 .38 Special/.357 Magnum revolver.


What’s good

The 692 is an interesting multiple-ammunition seven-shooter.

    There is a caveat here. Taurus properly recommends loading only six cartridges and leaving the hammer/firing pin on an empty chamber. If the gun falls and the internal safety fails — as has been known to happen — the firing pin will fall on the empty chamber. This explains why in “real” horse operas, the shooter has to reload after only five shots.

The 692 fires .38 Special (including “+P”) and .357 Magnum in its standard mode.

Swapping out the cylinder — a very easy and relatively quick procedure — turns it into a 9mm (including “+P”) revolver.

The only problem with using the less expensive but equally potent 9mm ammunition is that the 9mm cartridges must be fitted into what Taurus calls “stellar” clips, a/k/a “moon” or “star” clips (right). This can be done manually, with a little patience, or with a special tool, some of which will damage the budget.

Likewise, removing spent casings from clips can be done manually — a pair of needle nose piles to grab and turn the casing works fine — or with a special tool. A top of the line loader/unloader can cost about US$100.

My 692 came with five “stellar” clips; I added another five.

Two benefits of the clips are (1) they can be pre-loaded and emptied away from the range, saving costly range time, and (2) loading/unloading using the clips is much faster than loading individual cartridges. When I head to the $15-an-hour range, I have 49 rounds (7*7) in clips ready to load and fire.

The extra clips allow me to load another 21 (7*3) rounds of a different 9mm load.

Recoil and accuracy

Although the 692 has a 3-inch ported barrel, 9mm FMJ ammunition still gave a noticeable recoil.

The 692’s soft grip made the recoil tolerable. Firing .357 Magnums, which hurt when fired from the 2-inch barrel 605, also were tolerable.

This was my introduction to 9mm. I have fired .38s from the 605 and from an over-and-under Derringer with no noticeable recoil.

My target acquisition WAS better; I attribute that partially to the longer barrel.

The 692 has an adjustable (up/down, left/right) rear sight that, now adjusted, should improve my accuracy.

My son the LEO has Springfield Armory .40 and .45 semi-autos with less recoil than the 692 firing 9mm or .357 Magnum. Gun design might have something to do with felt recoil.

What’s not so good

Nearly 100% of my range shooting is single action (SA); I manually pull back the hammer then squeeze the trigger.

A good thing since the trigger pull on double action (DA) is so hard that the barrel moves off target. (Double action means the gun — not the shooter — performs the double action of cocking and dropping the hammer when the trigger is pulled.)

How many pounds pull? To be determined. Can a lighter spring be installed? Certainly, by a trained gunsmith.

The old 605’s trigger pull was fine for both single and double action.

The bluing — actually black matte — is only “pretty good."

After about 100 rounds, the finish has come off part of the trigger and beneath the cylinder. (Image below)

The 605 also had finish problems, but I bought it used. The 692 was new, fresh out of the box.

 

 

Is it Liberty or is it Taurus

I don’t know about other revolvers or semi-automatics, but with Taurus wheel guns, Liberty .357 Magnums get stuck in the chambers.

I fired five rounds of Liberty .357s from the 605 and had to wait at least 10 minutes before I was able to eject the cases.

I fired seven rounds of Liberty .357s from a cold 692. The shells ejected properly.

Then I changed cylinders and fired 49 rounds of 9mm.

The .38/.357 cylinder was installed and I fired perhaps 14 rounds of FMJ .357s.

With three rounds left, I filled out the cylinder with four Liberty .357s.

The fired FMJ rounds ejected cleanly. The Liberty casings were tightly stuck in their chambers.

After more than a half-hour I was able, with the aid of a Phillips head screwdriver and a make-shift hammer, to drive the Liberty cases from the cylinder.

I don’t know if the material Taurus uses to make its wheel guns or the material Liberty uses for its cartridges is at fault, but for at least two different Taurus revolvers, Liberty is not suitable.

I have complained to both Liberty, another Florida firm, and Taurus. No response from either company.

Pity; the Liberty 50 grain .357s have almost zero recoil and the bullets have excellent expansion.

Clean-up

One major advantage of a wheel gun is ease and speed of clean-up.

Unlike a semi-automatic that has to be field stripped, the revolver remains fully assembled. A rod, brush, some swabs, and a liberal application of Ballistol Cleaner/Lubricant/Protection oil is all that’s needed.

While semi-autos normally have the advantage of more cartridges in the weapon — 10 or more rounds in the gun’s magazine — magazines are known to fail.

The wheel gun, on the other hand, holds less ammunition, but with speed loaders or clips, the disadvantage is reduced.

The final advantage I appreciate is the fact that the revolver doesn’t eject hot cases into the air where who knows where, or who, they will strike. I can, and do, easily collect my brass for reloaders.

There IS much to be said for semi-autos, but for this scrivener, revolvers are better.




PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Taurus 692 revisited


Thursday, February 6, 2020

Opuscula

Bad behavior
Shames US
Before world

CIVILITY IS A THING OF THE PAST for politicians.

At President Trump’s State of the (dis)Union speech he insulted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi by ignoring her extended hand as he handed Vice President Pence and Ms. Pelosi copies of his about-to-be-made speech.

Was it a deliberate snub or did he simply not see her hand? He already was turning when she offered her hand.

Even prize fighters “touch gloves” before proceeding to bloody each other.

Ms. Pelosi quickly hit back by introducing the president sans the normal high privilege and distinct honor terminology.

 

Trump & Pelosi: Who started first? Cartoon by Rick McKeem Augusta Chronicle 18 JAN 2019

 


Throughout Mr. Trump’s speech Ms. Pelosi could be seen — and she must have been aware of the cameras — mouthing comments about Mr. Trump’s words.

Perhaps there is a lip reader who can tell us what Ms. Pelosi was saying. THAT would be interesting. Did Mr. Pence hear her words; he seemed not to react to her comments so perhaps they were meant solely for the tv cameras.

Although Mr. Trump scored points with an award to a dying conservative commentator, a family reunion with an Army sergeant, and the promise to a little girl that funding was set aside for her to attend any school she wishes, Ms. Pelosi got the last hit.

She not only tore up Mr. Trump’s speech, but she divided it into three parts so that the media would be sure capture her contempt for the president. Petulant, petty, Pelosi.

 

 

Send her packing?


Ms. Pelosi violates the law by destroying government document (Dry Bones cartoon for 6 FEB 2020)

 

Did she, or did she not, violate the law.

According to Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk (https://tinyurl.com/vwglh6j), "Nancy Pelosi may have just committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2071, Section 2071 (a) when she ripped up President Trump’s State of the Union address. This violation is punishable by up to three years in prison."

However Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, Georgetown Law professor Victoria Nourse, and Douglas Cox, professor of law at the City of New York University School of Law, rule that what Ms Pelosi did was legal.

Bill McCarthy, PolitiFact Staff Writer, writes that There are probably countless copies of Trump’s address, such as the version the White House posted online. Pelosi’s action doesn’t preclude future generations from accessing one.

Perhaps the question needs to be decided by the Supremes.

 

Nazi salutes? Democrats and "Women in White" attempt to shout down Mr. Trump. (NYTimes, https://nyti.ms/2ukvYQO @ 2:340

 

Democrat women dressed in white (learned from Communist Cuba?) stood and tried to shout down the president claiming he allegedly abuses women’s rights. Many of the group, and a few men as well, seemed to be giving the nazi salute.

It is not clear if the women were members of the house or invited guests; the New York Times video did not specify. Either way, another attack on civility.

 

Interestingly, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) who voted guilty at Mr. Trump’s trial was front-and-center for the State of the Union speech and sitting with fellow Republicans. Unlike his fellow Democrats, he stood and applauded Mr. Trump whenever the vice president stood.

Mr. Romney has long been a bitter foe of Mr. Trump, then the front-runner, and is famous for a speech he made in his home state, denouncing Mr. Trump and urging Republican primary voters to use tactical voting in the remaining primaries and caucuses to maximize the chance of denying Trump a delegate majority.

Mr. Romney was behaving like a Democrat even before the Democrats lost the election.

Bottom line:While the behavior of a president’s opponents to “sit on their hands” throughout the president’s State of the Union message, Ms. Pelosi’s behavior is beyond the pale as was the “Women in White” and their male supporters attempt to shout down the president.

Conversely, to the president’s credit, he did not mention the Democrats’ failed effort to remove him from office, not did he cite by name any of the blatantly anti-American representatives who seem to lack all respect, and who show disrespect for anyone who dares think differently.

While the Democrats behavior will win them points with the “progressives,” it may fail to garner votes in November.



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Bad Behavior

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Enterprise Risk Management, Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery

Coronavirus
Proves need
To plan ahead

A FEW YEARS AGO, before I gracefully retired, a person from Empire Today asked me to create a business continuity plan

  • only covering its retail outlets,
  • sans access to store personnel, and
  • right now, over the phone.

I told Empire Today’s caller that

  • covering only the retail outlets would not protect the business, and
  • that I don’t create instant plans over the phone.

End of conversation.

I HAVE FOR MANY YEARS been a proponent of Enterprise Risk management.

Business Continuity, I decided, focused too much on an owned operation. In my not-at-all humble opinion, to protect a business, the practitioner must start with the vendors — and sometimes the vendor’s vendors — and follow the risk “yellow brick road” to the product or service’s final destination: the consumer.

In the case of Empire Today, the company gets its wood from the Far East.

I’m not certain WHERE in the Far East — my caller told me not to worry about supplies, only about the stores — but China’s coronavirus reminded me of the call.

Nothing new under the sun

Most practitioners remember, or should have read about, the last bird flu epidemic, or more accurately, bird flu panic.

Business leaders worried about missing personnel.

Being “facility focused,” they failed to consider

  • Their vendors
  • Movement of materials from the vendor site to the facility — even electronic data transfers
  • In-house personnel, both profit centers and support staffs
  • Are sales personnel available and active
  • Movement of product to wholesaler or to customer
  • Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable — are the financial institutions functioning
  • And, rarely considered, government interference — quarantines, lack of staff at international air and sea ports and border crossings

And these are just “off the top of my head.”

From Disaster Recovery to Enterprise Risk Management

Most people think that risk management started with IT disaster recovery.

It did not.

Back in the early 1960s, when I wore Air Force blue (on the few chilly days we had at Orlando AFB — now also retired), the military was practicing risk management pretty much across all operations.

Preventive maintenance for personnel and equipment was Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). We lined up to either give or receive inoculations to prevent illnesses wherever our Favorite Uncle sent us.

Hurricane threatens? The Charge of Quarters (this scrivener) went out to start the generator of each of the wards and the clinic. If a critical generator failed to start, patients were moved to a ward where the generator DID start.

Checking to see if the generators would crank, I learned after collecting my DD214, is the last step in generator testing. Making certain there is fuel and that the fuel is not contaminated precede the start-up test.

For all that, “disaster recovery” gained a following with the increasing dependency on IT.

As a consultant with what was then DMR in Tampa FL, I did a job for GTE Data Systems. The company wanted to map its national data network and to identify areas that needed to be improved.

Not long after the project completed, the network crashed, but thanks to the project, the network quickly was restored.

Not everyone learned the lesson.

I worked for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services in Norfolk VA. Zim’s headquarters in Haifa, Israel hired IBM to create a “business continuity” plan for the Norfolk (U.S. headquarters) operation. IBM produced a fine disaster recovery plan for the IT operations, but never stepped outside the data center. I later convinced the IT boss that his machines were of zero value if there was no one to use the data and Zim got a true Business Continuity plan — that promptly was shelved until after a storm closed the business for a week.

American Express realized the value of end-to-end risk management.

I was fortunate to work on an Amex project that covered several states and a multitude of vendors.

I suggested to the project manager that Amex request business continuity plans from each critical vendor for my review. It did.

The exercise (a) gave each vendor a free critique from another practitioner and (b) broadened my expertise by seeing what concerned other planners. Amex made getting vendor business continuity plans part of its contracting process.

We discovered that Amex needed to arrange back-up for some critical vendors.

No two plans are alike

I have created plans for national retail outlets, so creating a plan for Empire Today was well within my expertise.

But it is impossible to create a plan sans input from profit center personnel.

It is foolish to create a plan that covers only one aspect of the business.

I can imagine risks to individual sites — Lucent Technologies built a beautiful building and put its profit center behind huge glass windows on the building’s ground floor. Trouble was, the building was constructed on a flood plain.

Too late for enterprise risk management? True, but it pointed out the need to involve risk management practitioners early on in the planning.

But Empire Today wanted a single plan for all of its retail outlets.

Instantly, over the phone.

In all the years I created plans, only one other person demanded an instant, over-the-phone plan. He also didn’t get a plan.

Involve everyone

While at DMR I was part of a team creating a plan for a State of Florida department.

The State encouraged its people to candidly work with us and they did.

At one point the discussion turned to communication options.

The State uses microwave towers for much of its communications, especially law enforcement.

As everyone knows, Florida sometimes gets windy — very windy.

What happens if a microwave tower does down?

A retired Florida Highway Patrol office, working for his second state pension, suggested “Get a crane and hoist the dish high until the fallen tower is replaced.”

At Zim, I asked the HR manager what risks his department faced.

None, he replied.

Then his more experienced assistant entered the conversation and reminded him that missing federal I-9 forms can be expensive if the Feds want to check employee eligibility to work in the U.S.

Finally, the manager offered that a neighboring business might be a target of protesters and that a protest might spill over to Zim property, preventing personnel from entering or leaving the building.

Sometimes a planner has to “prime the pump.”

A long way from the coronavirus

We have come a long way from considering the impact of the Chinese coronavirus, but with enterprise risk management, nothing is “out of scope.” Very often one thing leads to another, as with the case of Zim’s HR personnel.

While all plans have the same basic skeleton, every plan is unique.

Plans cannot be created without input from both management AND the people doing the work.

Plans cannot be created instantly over the phone. (Usually, when that is the requirement, the “customer” is looking for a “freebie.”)

Finally, a true enterprise risk management plan is all inclusive and includes business continuity and disaster recovery.



PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Vindication

Sunday, February 2, 2020

POLITICAL

Dems ignore
The obvious

DEMOCRATS HAVE DECIDED: Trumps peace plan is a “sham.”

Joe Biden: ”A peace plan requires two sides to come together.”

Lizzie Warren: “Releasing a plan without negotiating with Palestinians isn’t diplomacy, it’s a sham.”

Their fellow candidates generally are in full agreement and fall into step with “The Squad.”

How many times have the “Palestinians” been invited to find a peaceful, political solution to their plight?

Saudi Arabian journalist Ahmad Adnan wrote in his column1 in the daily ‘Okaz:

    The P.A. has made negative statements against the deal. I maintain that at this stage it needs a friend to be honest with it, telling it and advising it: Sign the deal and then curse it as much as you want, day and night. The Palestinians have in decades past specialized in missing golden opportunities because of [their] mistaken assessment of their capabilities and of the crisis. Let us present a few regrettable examples.

    1. At the 1939 London conference, and before that at the Cyprus conference, the Arabs rejected the Zionist proposal that the percentage of Jewish members of parliament in the future state in Palestine should be 33% so that the parliament in that Arab country would not pass laws against them.

    2. The Arabs rejected the Partition Plan [U.N. Resolution] 181 in 19472. Tunisian president [Habib] Bourguiba’s statements about peace in Jericho in 1965 [garnered] Palestinian and Arab condemnation.

    3. The Arabs ignored the Arab kingdom’s initiative proposed by King Hussein bin Talal [of Jordan] in 1972.3

    4. The Arabs boycotted Egypt after the1978 Camp David Accords; [Syrian president] Hafez al-Assad rejected the ‘Rabin Deposit’ [proposal for Israel-Syria normalization] (1994-96); 4

    5. Yasser Arafat thwarted the Camp David II summit in 2000;

    6. Some Arabs (Qatar, Syria, and Hamas) conspired against the Arab peace initiative endorsed by the Arab League in 2002 at the Beirut summit in accordance with a Saudi proposal.

    “With regard to the Palestinian refugees, I will mention president Bill Clinton’s and [Israeli prime minister] Ehud Barak’s proposal to Yasser Arafat at the Camp David summit to allow the refugees to return to an independent Palestinian state and the return of 50,000 refugees every year to the State of Israel as part of family reunification, and [paying] reparations to refugees who do not want to return. Clinton committed to a sum of $20 billion along with his efforts to obtain a similar sum from Europe, Japan and the Gulf states.

This from a writer in a fellow Muslim state.

Abu Mazen (Abbas) rejected Trump’s plan sight-unseen.

Abu Mazen even refused to accept a phone call from the president.

How can you include a party to an agreement when the party won’t even come to the table? When the party won’t even answer the phone?

Apparently the only way to get anyone to a peace conference is to thoroughly defeat them in war — as the allies did in World War 2 to the Japanese and Germans. Even the Koreans occasionally sit down and pretend to talk peace.

Still, the Democrat candidates and their followers contend that Abu Mazen’s petulance is Trump’s fault.

Even when the PLO comes to the table and agrees to anything, it quickly abrogates the agreement.

Further, Abu Mazen cannot make an agreement.

He is an unelected president (serving well past his term of office)

He represents neither Hamas nor Islamic Brotherhood that control Gaza.

What about Egypt?

Will the Egyptians allow Hamas and Islamic Brotherhood on its borders?

Embassy move

S. 1322 (104th): Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 was approved by the Senate AND the House on 24 OCT 1995 24 years ago.5 The bill authorized relocation of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Israel’s capital, Jerusalem. All other U.S. embassies are located in national capitals.

The bill allowed the president to delay implementation of the relocation on a six-month basis, and until President Trump followed congress’ wishes and relocated the embassy to Israel’s historic (since Kind David c. 1035 — 970 BCE) capital.

Based on the fact that the PLO has remained intransigent in its position on Israel despite multiple peace offers since 1948, apparently Mr. Trump saw no reason to continue to appease the PLO.

Why previous presidents — both Democrat and Republican — failed to follow the wishes of Congress can be speculated as a hope that either the PLO would succeed in turning Israel into yet another Muslim, Jew-free, state or that the PLO would finally recognize the reality of Israel.

Bottom line: the incumbent president was fully within his rights to relocate the embassy to Jerusalem, making it the same as every other U.S. embassy — in the host country’s capital.



Sources

1. Saudi journalist: https://tinyurl.com/sxvmgve

2. Peace proposal 1: https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/5

3. Peace proposal 2: https://tinyurl.com/tfvuma5

4. Peace proposal 3: https://tinyurl.com/vc6ewey

5. Embassy: https://tinyurl.com/y8mn9hdb

עינים להם ולא יראו * אזנים להם ולא יאזנו

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Ignoring the obvious