I DON’T HAVE ALL THE FACTS. but after another Broward County Sheriff’s Office (BSO) deputy kills another person I am beginning to wonder about BSO’s rules of engagement.
According to local tv “news” reporting on what a BSO spokesperson told the stations1, 2
My First Born is a LEO in another jurisdiction.
When I related the incident to him, his response was “meet deadly force with deadly force.”
I expect that is the mindset of all, or at least most, LEOs. I can understand that, but . . .
Maybe the knife-wielding man was “high” on something and was incapable of making a reasoned decision.
Maybe the knife-wielding man was remorseful for slaying his ex-girlfriend and wanted to commit “suicide by cop,” an all too frequent nightmare for most LEOs.
There could be many “maybe”s; the responding officers from the BSO and other jurisdictions couldn’t know the man’s thoughts.
Still.
With the number of responding LEOs — there were three from the BSO alone — why did they have to kill the man?
There were
- Multiple LEOs on the scene
- Most must have been armed with Tasers3, a/k/a normally non-deadly stun guns
- Most must have been provided batons (billy clubs or night sticks).
I wasn’t there so everything here is speculation.
Could the LEOs, who had the man outnumbered at least 3-to1 (and the suggestion from the tv is that there were more LEOs on scene than just the three from the BSO) have disarmed him using non-lethal means: Tasers, batons.?
I am not a criminal coddling liberal and I stand solidly with LEOs who truly are threatened; I agree with my First Born, “meet deadly force with deadly force.”
But I wonder: Was the knife-wielding person capable of using “deadly force” against the LEOs? Was there no other way to subdue the person?
I repeat: I was not at the scene and all the above is speculation.
Will body cameras show what happened from the time the LEOs arrived on scene until the fatal shot was fired?
Sources
1. http://tinyurl.com/yy62zod9
2. http://tinyurl.com/yyxtubke
3. Taser is a product of Axon (https://www.axon.com/)
PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.
No comments:
Post a Comment