Showing posts with label Al Qaeda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Qaeda. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

John McCain not withstanding

Deal with enemy
On enemy's terms

 

The following may not be considered "politically correct."

Torture and the Geneva Conventions

The Geneva Conventions concerning torture apply to members of uniformed armed forces.

They do not apply to terrorists wearing black pajamas or galabias (masked or not), or hoodies, or any other apparel not recognizable as a military (or naval) uniform. That rules out Al Qaeda in all its representations, ISIS or whatever its name-of-the-day, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, PLO and its "children," Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and similar organizations. It would exclude - if they still were around - the Black Panthers, Weather Underground, The Socialist Workers Party (SWP), and The Youth International Party (YIP); the KKK is a "uniformed" terror group, the uniform being sheets and pillow cases.

(A list of terrorist organizations, Islamic and otherwise, is provided on the Terrorist Organizations Fpage.)

Terrorists do not abide by any "humane" convention.

John McCain

I personally like Senator McCain; I would have liked to see him in the White House at one time. Despite that, Sen. McCain and I part company over treatment of terrorists.

On December 9, 2014, Sen. McCain in a floor speech said the following (excerpted from the speech)

    “I have long believed some of these practices amounted to torture, as a reasonable person would define it, especially, but not only the practice of waterboarding, which is a mock execution and an exquisite form of torture. Its use was shameful and unnecessary; and, contrary to assertions made by some of its defenders and as the Committee’s report makes clear, it produced little useful intelligence to help us track down the perpetrators of 9/11 or prevent new attacks and atrocities.

    “I know from personal experience that the abuse of prisoners will produce more bad than good intelligence. I know that victims of torture will offer intentionally misleading information if they think their captors will believe it. I know they will say whatever they think their torturers want them to say if they believe it will stop their suffering. Most of all, I know the use of torture compromises that which most distinguishes us from our enemies, our belief that all people, even captured enemies, possess basic human rights, which are protected by international conventions the U.S. not only joined, but for the most part authored.

    “The knowledge of torture’s dubious efficacy and my moral objections to the abuse of prisoners motivated my sponsorship of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, which prohibits ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’ of captured combatants, whether they wear a nation’s uniform or not.

Emphasis above mine.

Then again, consider:

Orde Wingate

Wingate's basic philosophy toward the enemy was "There is only one way to deal with the situation, to persuade the gangs that, in their predatory raids, there is every chance of their running into a government gang which is determined to destroy them."

Wingate was referring to the English Mandatory goverenment, not a Jewish, government.

In the "some things never change" department, Wingate has been criticized for the harsh methods his force used against the enemy and those who assisted them. Cruelty and punitive humiliation provoked negative comment from some of the Haganah people and from Moshe Sharett (Shertok) who was otherwise a friend and admirer of Wingate. However, Wingate's methods were no worse than the brutal tactics employed by other British forces in Palestine in putting down the revolt, and the Arab gangs they were fighting were killing civilians mercilessly.

Legend has it that Wingate captured two Arabs who, he was convinced, knew where arms were cached. He asked one Arab the cache's location. No reply. He took out his service revolver, put it to the Arab's head and asked again, telling the Arab the result if he failed to provide the information. Again, no answer.

He shot the Arab and went to the second Arab, pointed the revolver at the man's head and asked the question again. This time he got his answer.

Torture? Perhaps. Contrary to Sen. McCain's contention of "torture’s dubious efficacy", Wingate's tactic proved its worth.

Col. Allen West in Iraq

Then Lt. Col. West was cashiered for convincing an enemy he would die if he failed to provide needed information. There are two at variance stores about this incident on the Web:

  1. Dealing With Muslims and
  2. Allen West
Take you pick; both entries show West did what he felt necessary to protect his troops.

Caveat: I have had personal dealing with West and he has my respect.

In the Philippines

In a Snopes entry that works very hard at being "politically correct," the undetermined status story about U.S. troops putting down Muslim terrorism by executing captured terrorists with pig-greased bullets and then burying them with porcine entrails. One of the captured terrorists was allowed to return to his associates; Muslim terrorism allegedly ceased in the Philippines for the next 50 years.

Bet Shean, Israel

Some terrorists crossed the border from Jordan many years ago and entered the Israeli border community of Bet Shean. Most of the residents of Bet Shean are refugees from North Africa, people who are familiar with Muslim belief and customs.

The terrorists, after managing to murder a few locals, were killed by the army. The residents doused the terrorists' bodies with kerosene and set them afire. Muslim belief holds that a burned body cannot go to heaven; no 70 virgins.

No terrorist returned to Bet Shean for decades; when one did, he was stopped before he got to the community. His fate was a short stay in an Israeli prison.

Caveat: I have relatives in Bet Shean.

Bottom line

Does dealing with the enemy on OUR (Western) terms work?

In a word: No.

Does dealing with the enemy on the enemy's terms work?

In two words: Apparently, yes.

If the enemy deals with us on "Geneva Convention" terms, then we should respond accordingly.

Unfortunately, only the leftist bleeding hearts fail to understand that simple truth.

Perhaps Sen. McCain is correct: the U.S. should abandon physical torture. In it's place let the enemy know we will follow the lead of Orde Wingate, Allen West, the officer in the Philippines, and the good people of Bet Shean. But we MUST make good on the psychological threats; if we bluff even once, we are lost.

Since Al Qaeda et al still terrorize the world, obviously the left's approach doesn't work.


Thursday, September 11, 2014

Opuscula

Obama's "Plan"
For Terrorists

 

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"
Jorge Agustín Nicolás Ruiz de Santayana y BorrásNote 1

U.S. President Obama's plan to counter ISIS is to

  1. Form a coalition (the better to share the blame when things go wrong - and they will)

  2. Add aerial attacks on ISIS (only)
  3. Add U.S. "advisors" on the ground
  4. Train "moderate Islamists" in Saudi Arabia (did anyone ask the Saudi royalty if it will welcome Islamists?)
  5. Arm "moderate Islamists" to combat ISIS

Read military history

Obama and his yes men (and women) are determined to defeat ISIS - but only ISIS, not any other Islamists terrorist group - by sending drones and presumably naval aircraft to seek out ISIS troops and, although the U.S. is appalled when Israel does it, to assassinate ISIS leaders in their vehicles, in their bunkers, in their homes; where ever they are found.

Good intentions, I learned early on, "pave the road to hell."


Arming & Training

The U.S. armed the Taliban to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.

The Taliban, having pushed the Soviets out, then turned the U.S.-supplied weapons on - surprise - U.S. personnel.

The U.S., having unseated Saddam Hussein in Iraq, trained and armed Iraqi "police" who turned the weapons on fellow Iraqis and - surprise - U.S. personnel.

The U.S. also armed and trained "Palestinian" police who turned the weapons on - hardly a surprise - Israeli civilians.

Advisors in theater

Former President and 5-star general Dwight D. Eisenhower sent U.S. military personnel into Vietnam as Military Advisory Groups to help out the South Vietnamese. Advisors, not combat troops. Those who followed "Ike" into the White House sent in more and more combat troops - not enough to win the conflict, but enough to replace those Americans killed in 'Nam. Despite being a 5-star general, Ike apparently failed to keep up with (then) "modern" history; he failed to remember what the Vietnamese did to the French (they chased them out).

MAGs - like subcompact cars - seem to grow like a kid's balloon being filled from a high-pressure gas station air pump.


Click on image to enlarge

Obama is taking credit - perhaps deserved - for drawing down U.S. troop strength in Iraq and Afghanistan which have become "Vietnam 2" and "Vietnam 3." In both cases, his predecessors in the White House got the U.S. involved in conflicts that did not - at least directly - involve the U.S.

Unfortunately, control of air space and the ability to strike an enemy almost at will will not - as any grunt (foot soldier) knows and the Israeli military is relearning - suffice to control movements on the ground.

Obama, or his successor, will need to commit to long-term aerial attacks and be prepared to accept civilian "collateral damage" - the same "damage" for which the world condemns Israel.

Syria's almost-internal war

IMO, the U.S. has NO business taking sides in Syria's sectarian battles, for that's what it boils down to: Sunni vs. Shia vs. Alewites vs. who knows.Note 2 Kurds?

Syria's conflict spills over into Lebanon where Hezbollah holds forth. So far, Syrian combatants have been mostly successful in keeping the shooting on the Syrian side of the country's border with Israel, and Israel's government has, so far, managed to keep out of Syrian politics - a lesson the U.S. should adopt.

My chutzpah, my suggestions to Obama

One: Limit U.S. attacks on Islamist terrorists groups that blatantly threaten the U.S. or its citizens.

Two: Order all U.S. citizens out of Syria and Iraq; failure to remove to a safe place could result in their being "collateral damage" that, like the citizens of Gaza, were warned by Israel to relocate before an attack.

Three: Tell U.S. "intelligence" people - who seem to have no clue of Muslim mentality - to buy their information from sources that DO understand Muslim mentality. That may not be the Israeli government since, since Begin, it seems it lacks this knowledge.

Four: Train, if we must, "moderate Islamists" if any can be found; "moderate" should NOT mean "less of a blustering threat than ISIS" or "any group that has not beheaded anyone lately."

Five: DO NOT ARM anyone; remember the Taliban; remember the Iraqis; remember the Palestinians. Giving arms to Islamists is giving arms to people who will turn them against Americans.

Six: Finally, NO BOOTS ON THE GROUND - the war in Syria and Lebanon is mostly a civil war, an internal affair even though combatants are coming from all over the world. It is NOT the U.S.' fight. (True, some of the blame for the current upheaval can be laid to Obama's door for encouraging and supporting the "Arab Spring." )

If any organization should interfere in Syria it is the Arab League (or however the organization is known today). But, Mr. Obama, please note that no Muslim states are lining up to support ANY side in the conflict. Take a lesson from your Muslim kin and stay out of Syria.

Go after Islamist terrorist wherever they are found, invited or not, but do NOT involve the U.S. in civil conflicts.

President James Monroe was right.Note 3

 

Notes

1: If you prefer, “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.”
Edmund Burke

2: From Wikipedia
Sunni Islam Shia Islam, Sufism, Ahmadiyya Islam, Kharijite Islam, Quranism, Moorish Science, Nation of Islam, Mahdavism, Messiah Foundation international, Zikri, Five Percenter

3: Read President Monroe's 1823 Message to Congress at www.ourdocuments.gov