Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biden. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 25, 2021

Opuscula

Is Afghanistan
‘Nam over again?

IMAGES OF AFGHANS TRYING TO LEAVE Afghanistan before the Taliban assumes full control. Afghanistan’s former president earlier abandoned his country to avoid “transition issues.” Something unique in U.S. foreign policy history? Hardly.

Dry Bones cartoon

Is it any wonder the U.S.’ “allies” are suspicious of Washington’s promises? Rhetorical question.  

San Diego Union-Tribune Image by Neal Ulevich - AP (https://tinyurl.com/3k7nerdw)
The Print Twitter screengrab
(https://tinyurl.com/zru98mu8)
 

AFGHANISTAN SEEMS TO BE VIETNAM all over again.

Aside from the fact that the U.S. never had a policy to win a war in Afghanistan — or Vietnam, or Korea, or Iraq, or Cuba, or — there are many similarities with earlier excursions on behalf of “democracy and the American way.”

The U.S. president who got American troops out of the Vietnam quagmire was a Republican (Richard M. Nixon). The president who ended the U.S.’ 20-year involvement in Afghanistan is a Democrat (Jos. Biden), although to give credit where it is due, under a deal signed last year between the militants and then-President Donald Trump, foreign forces were to have left by 1 May. (http://tinyurl.com/27muz8yn)

In both cases, when the troops came home — from a politically unpopular war in the Far East and when they returned from what appeared to be a never-ending conflict in Afghanistan, — the military people returned sans war materiel, left behind for the victors.

When the troops returned to the States, they abandoned locals who supported the war effort.

In Vietnam, some managed to get a flight out — primarily those who worked directly for the U.S. government.

For many of those left behind, the victorious Communists had a place for them: re-education camps. (Such “camps” are popular with the Vietnamese’ masters, Communist China.)

Will the Taliban have “re-education” camps a la Vietnam?

U.S. fails to learn from others

The U.S. failed to learn the lesson the Vietnamese taught the French.

They warred against the French until the French tired of the fighting and left Vietnam.

President (ex-5-star general) Dwight D. Eisenhower sent in a limited number of U.S. troops as “Military Advisory Groups” (MAGs). His successors, Democrats JFK and LBJ massively increased the U.S. presence in Vietnam on a piecemeal basis — as troops were wounded or killed, they were replaced by green personnel.

Vietnam was NOT the first war in which Americans refused to fight. That “honor” goes back to the War for Southern Independence (a/k/a U.S. Civil War) when people could, and did, “buy their way out” by paying for stand-ins.

    The Enrollment Act of 1863 provided that a draftee could pay a “substitute” enrollee the sum of $300 (about $5,000 in today’s terms) in order to enlist in his place. Such famous Americans as Grover Cleveland and John D. Rockefeller took advantage of this provision, in effect buying their way out of service. (https://tinyurl.com/9thvtsaw)

Actually, after the first skirmishes of the Revolutionary War many new Americans had other things to do rather than engage the English.

In Afghanistan, the U.S. started supporting the Afghans in their effort to oust the Soviets.

 

Revolving door (a la Vietnam)

 

It was very much the CIA’s covert war with a program to arm and finance the mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan prior to and during the military intervention by the Soviet Union. (https://tinyurl.com/2t355rsy)

After 9-11-2001 — the day Muslim terrorists flew four U.S. airliners into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, into the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and into a field in Pennsylvania; in the the latter high jackers, were overcome by the flight’s passengers and crew — the CIA directed its efforts in Afghanistan to attacking the Taliban and its leader, Osama bin Laden. (https://tinyurl.com/2wbyes84)

According to a New York Times article (https://tinyurl.com/5b9ya9bk), the FBI knew well in advance of 9-11 that Muslims were buying flight training. Anecdotal stories claim that the “students” were not interested in landing the commercial airliners.

They won’t fight

According to Biden, the Afghans lack the will to defend their nation, despite the fact that — with substantial U.S. CIA aid — some Afghanis did take up arms against the former Soviet Union.

An Afghan guerrilla handles a U.S.-made Stinger anti-aircraft missile (https://tinyurl.com/y466xn5m)

Afghan borders Taliban ally Pakistan and the western world’s nemesis, Iran. (See map, below).

All are Muslim countries and while they often disagree, the enemy of my friend is my enemy. In this case, since the western world is deemed by Iran’s despots to be an enemy, Afghanistan is, by default, Iran’s friend (as is Pakistan).

Map of Afghanistan and its neighbors

The Taliban, Afghanistan’s rulers-du-jour, are infamous for being misogynistic.

They demanded women to be covered from head to toe according to their ideas of sharia law.

They banned education for females.

The “new” Taliban

According to reports making the media, the “new” Taliban will treat females with respect and they will allow females to be educated, unlike the “old” Taliban. (https://tinyurl.com/ye8jzawt)

The “new” Taliban promised to respect others religions, unlike the “old” Taliban of 2001 that blew up two statues of Buddah in the Bamyan valley of central Afghanistan. (https://tinyurl.com/qjuwbed)

The Taliban claimed the Buddhas violated Islam's prohibition on idolatry.

According to The Indian Express (https://tinyurl.com/yfbq8w24), “The Taliban have promised a new era of peace and security, saying they will forgive those who fought against them and grant women full rights under Islamic law, without elaborating. But many Afghans are deeply skeptical of the group, especially those who remember its previous rule, when it imposed a harsh interpretation of Islamic law. “

Still, the “new” Taliban apparently retains elements of the “old” Taliban.

The Indian Express (ibid.) reports that “The Taliban have blown up the statue of a Shiite militia leader who had fought against them during Afghanistan’s civil war in the 1990s, according to photos circulating on social media Wednesday.

“The statue depicted Abdul Ali Mazari, a militia leader killed by the Taliban in 1996, when the Islamic militants seized power from rival warlords. Mazari was a champion of Afghanistan’s ethnic Hazara minority, Shiites who were persecuted under the Sunni Taliban’s earlier rule.”

So much for forgiving those who fought against them.

Some of the “old” Taliban’s actions remain to haunt them.

A video now being circulated of a woman being murdered, apparently by the Taliban on an Afghan street, actually dates from 2015, according to the India Today Anti Fake News War Room (AFWA) (https://tinyurl.com/yenpt6yx)

On the other hand, the England’s ITV (https://tinyurl.com/rn2v4ar8) reported on 17 August 2021 that “Abdul Qadir Jalil, an Afghan-born Manchester (England) resident, traveled to Afghanistan around three weeks ago to get married.

“Mr Jalil says the Taliban has ransacked his home in Kabul, and executed people in his street.

"Last night, the Taliban was trying to attack and search every house in the street," he told ITV News. They are searching for smart phones because they are trying to wipe social media evidence.“

 


 

 

 

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

 

 

 

Comment on Vietnam again?

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

opuscula

World power’s
End caused
By no win wars?

Donald Trump started it.

Joe Biden and Harris-Emhoff will finish it.

“It” is America’s exit from Afghanistan.

 

Right or wrong, American soldiers have been involved in Afghanistan since 2001 following the Muslim attack on 11 SEP 2001 that brought down two buildings in New York, punched a massive hole in the Pentagon in Virginia, and — thanks to brave passengers — plowed a furrow in a Pennsylvania field. (https://tinyurl.com/4chsxesb)

Over the more than two decades of U.S. military presence in Afghanistan, more than 2,300 U.S. military personnel have been killed. (https://tinyurl.com/3t2nutmz)

Since World War 2, the U.S. has gone from war (Korea) to war (Vietnam) to war (Iraq 1 & 2) and numerous skirmishes.

All of the wars since WW2 were “no win” for the U.S. and its occasional allies.

    True, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was eliminated, but Iranians and their proxies soon filled the vacuum, a vacuum left by the Geo. H.W. Bush presidency. (https://tinyurl.com/6khnm2cm)

    More than 4.500 U.S. military personnel lost their lives in Iraq between 2003 and 2020. (https://tinyurl.com/fetx49hu)

Americans are tired of “no win” wars.

Americans are tired of being the “world’s policemen.”

It is not fear; most of the men and women in uniform are brave enough.

It is simply knowing that the politicians allegedly “running” the wars don’t finish the job.

Harry S Truman was the last president to “finish the job.” (https://tinyurl.com/nxbn28jy)

 

”Allies” worried

America’s “allies” and “friends,” especially the Muslims, are concerned that the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan will allow the Taliban to recover and, in turn, will help the so-called Islamic State, in its various incarnations, to reconstitute, therefore threatening the U.S.’ Muslim “fair weather friends.”

In addition, China (https://tinyurl.com/4dtnuyd6), England (https://tinyurl.com/4r7mekpy), and Pakistan (https://tinyurl.com/khh7a4e6) must be concerned about the resurgence of Islamic State.

Islamic State had operations in Muslim-dominated countries around the world.

In Iraq and Syria, it used many of those countries' existing governorate boundaries to subdivide territory it conquered and claimed; it called these divisions wilayah or provinces. By June 2015, IS had also established official "provinces" in Libya, Egypt (Sinai Peninsula), Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Algeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and the North Caucasus. It received pledges of allegiance and published media releases via groups in Somalia, Bangladesh, and the Philippines, but it has not announced any further official branches, instead identifying new affiliates as simply "soldiers of the caliphate". (https://tinyurl.com/59fdj4)

The question remains: As Islamic State reconstitutes on fertile ground (ibid.), will U.S. politicians volunteer Americans to contest Islamic State and its followers?

The alternative seems to be China.

That begs the question: Will the Biden/Harris-Emhoff regime allow China to spread its hegemony in an area the U.S. has for many years considered, rightly or wrongly, is own sphere of influence. Biden allegedly already has a financial stake in China.

    In an opinion piece by the Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Board, the publication contends that A May 2017 email thread that includes a discussion about “remuneration packages” for six people as part of a business deal with a now-defunct Chinese energy titan, CEFC China Energy. The Chinese company was international news a few years ago, after the U.S. government charged a CEFC-funded organization with money laundering, and its CEO was detained by Chinese authorities. CNN reported in 2018 that “at its height” CEFC was “hard to distinguish” from the Chinese government.

    According to the emails, both Bidens were in line in 2017 to benefit from a deal with CEFC. One email appears to identify Hunter Biden as “Chair/Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC.” It also refers to financial payments in terms of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy? (https://tinyurl.com/zjx2tcep)

China currently has a “One Belt, One Road" Initiative that extends, via land and sea, between China and Europe (see map, below). Toward that end, China is buying control of marine ports and offering to build railroads that would eventually expedite shipment of goods to and from China — as well as giving the Communists a financial and political foothold in all the nations on its routes.

    What this might imply for U.S. military and naval operations is anyone’s guess.

Map of China's "One Belt, One Road" Initiative (https://tinyurl.com/53kzztry)

 

America passe’?

There is a notion that a nation can remain a “power” for a finite number of years.

    British Empire (1707 – 1914)
    Greek rule (776 BCE to 323 BCE)
    Roman Empire ( 27 BCE – 476 BC )

While the U.S. was “just another country” until World War 1, it has been a “world power” only since 1917.

Will the withdrawal from Afghanistan and reneging on agreements, combined with the emergence of China as a contender, and the demise of the Soviet Union and Russia’s influence, signal the beginning of the end for U.S. influence around the globe.

Will the renminbi (RMB) with an image of Mao Zedong replace U.S. dollars bearing the features of Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln?

Chinese renminbi and U.S. $2 bill

Wars contributed to the demise of former powers.

No win wars may prove to lead to the demise of the United States as a world power.

 


 

 

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

 

 

 

Comment on No win wars

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Opuscula

Interim POTUS
Doing exactly
What Trump said

INTERIM PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN’s plans to combat the Chinese or Wuhan SARS Covid-19 virus seem to be an echo of President Trump’s announced, and now in action, plan.

Expect the igNoble Committee to give Biden and future president Kamala Harris-Emhoff the Nobel Peace Prize for doing what Trump started.

The Committee gave a Prize to Obama after a few months in office as a means of supporting the man, albeit he did nothing to deserve the prize. It refused to give President Trump the prize, even though under his administration “normalization” agreements were made between Israel and several Muslim countries — and more signing on — and arranged a peace agreement between two warring European nations (Serbia and Croatia).

 

UNLIKE THE DEMOCRATS who loudly proclaimed that “Trump is not MY president,” whether or not Biden-Emhoff won fairly — this scrivener has serious doubts — Biden “won” the election and Emhoff soon will move into the Oval Office. He, and later she, will be my president; I’m an American citizen (who voted), but I am — unlike the “progressive” Democrats — acknowledging that, by hook or by crook, the Democrats won the White House and I will not treat these people as the “progressives” treated Trump from before the primaries to his final days as president.

I will not lower myself to the name-calling and abuse the “progressives” heaped on Trump.

Not MY President Cartoon by Yaakov Kirschen

Let’s compare

Trump, who was not even considered by the Nobel Committee, managed “normalization” agreements between several Muslim nations and Israel.

Trump, who was not even considered by the Nobel Committee, managed to arrange a peace agreement between two European countries.

Trump, who was not even considered by the Nobel Committee, started troop draw-downs from conflict zones.

Trump, who was not even considered by the Nobel Committee, increased sanctions on Iran, a nation that threatens America, Israel, and many Muslim nations.

Trump, who was not even considered by the Nobel Committee, reduced funding to UNRWA which is infamous for its corruption, nepotism, and support of terror.

ON THE OTHER HAND

Obama brought the Muslims’ the destabilizing “Arab Spring”

Obama failed to slow Iran’s race to develop a nuclear weapon and delivery system.

Obama on his last day in office gifted millions to the PLO/PFLA to continue its attacks on Israeli civilians.

Obama’s Secretary of State (Hillary Clinton) allowed a planned “spontaneous” attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that resulted in the deaths of four Americans. (This despite consulate personnel asking State to send more protection.)

Obama did nothing to reduce the number of Americans in danger in foreign lands.

BUT Obama received the Nobel shortly after moving into the White House.

It is worth noting that the incoming, albeit probably interim, president was Obama’s VP, a trusted confidant and counselor.

Recap

Trump arranged normalization and peace agreement. Obama encouraged PLO/PFLP intransigence.

Trump eliminated funding to a terror-supporting, badly managed UNRWA. Obama supported it.

Trump drew down troops in Afghanistan. Obama did nothing.

Trump forced NATO to pick up more of the tab. Obama kept paying the moochers.

Seems to this scrivener the Nobel Committee ought to hang its collective head in shame.


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Echo

Sunday, November 15, 2020

Opuscula

Biden/Harris-Emhoff
Plans for the World
Are just speculation

NO MATTER WHAT YOU READ OR HEAR about what a Democrat president (Biden or Harris-Emhoff) might do with (pick a country), it all is just speculation.

Depending on the audience’s point of view, the speculation is tailored to match that preferred view.

 

IF, and with all the claims of fraud and apparently some evidence of fraud, that is a big IF/WHEN Harris-Emhoff becomes president, will she

  • Restore Obama’s failed foreign policy that
    • Gave the world the “Arab Spring”
    • That got Americans murdered in Benghazi
    • That subsidized the PLO/PFLP and Hamas/Islamic Jihad

    • Supported attacks on Israel citizens and visitors (regardless of religion or nationality)

    • That failed to gain peace agreements in

      • Europe (See History repeats, below)
      • The Middle East(See History repeats, below)

or will she

  • Follow a foreign policy dictated to her by The Squad, Bernie Sanders, and others on the far left?
  • Continue the socialist direction started by Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)

It makes no difference what Biden might want to do. There is a general consensus that he will be removed from office — by physical or mental health reasons — or by death during the first year in the Oval Office.

Bottom line: No matter what Biden says he will do, IF he prevails, the leftists represented by The Squad and their ilk will control both domestic and foreign policy.

Biden and the Democrats (except members of The Squad who admit to being anti-Israel) tell the world that they are “pro-Israel,” yet Biden’s 47-year history in D.C., especially as VP under Obama, belies that.

Like FDR before him, Biden always checks the political wind before making a decision; that never precluded him from changing a position if the “wind” shifted.

Many of Biden’s votes came from the far left, and as long as the wind blows from the far left, Biden will set his sails with it — until he is pushed out and Harris-Emhoff becomes America’s first

  • female
  • woman of color

president representing, if not America, then the far left in the (dis)United States.

Packing the Court

The Democrats either, depending on your point of view, promised (leftist Democrat) or threatened (average American) to “pack the court”; to increase the number of justices from nine to to ? Perhaps 15.

This follows in the Democratic party’s tradition.

FDR, the man who would be king, tried to pack the court with his loyalists. He didn’t exactly try to increase the court; he simply wanted to replace sitting justices.

FDR Packing the Court
(History on the Net.com @ https://tinyurl.com/yxpr8bju)

History Repeats

In digging around the internet for this entry, I stumbled across Theodore Roosevelt Facts (https://tinyurl.com/y4ggaozp). It seems that Donald Trump is TR reincarnated. The following will infuriate leftist Democrats, but according to the cited site:

    Theodore Roosevelt, President of the USA, received the Peace Prize for having negotiated peace in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-5. He also resolved a dispute with Mexico by resorting to arbitration as recommended by the peace movement.

    Roosevelt was the first statesman to be awarded the Peace Prize, and for the first time the award was controversial. The Norwegian Left argued that Roosevelt was a "military mad" imperialist who completed the American conquest of the Philippines. Swedish newspapers wrote that Alfred Nobel was turning in his grave, and that Norway awarded the Peace Prize to Roosevelt in order to win powerful friends after the dramatic dissolution of the union with Sweden the previous year.

    In domestic policy, Roosevelt was a radical within the Republican Party. He went in for social reforms and for state control of big capital. Roosevelt's term as President ended in 1908. During World War I he tried in vain to be allowed to serve as an officer, and in 1919 he opposed US membership of the new League of Nations.

Trump, of course, never received the Peace Prize, despite arranging peace between Kosovo and Serbia, and the deals between Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Israel. And he never fired a shot. Like TR, the treaties were negotiated; no one lost and everyone gained.

Neither Obama nor Biden received a Peace Prize for bringing peace to anyone, anywhere.

Indeed, according to Geir Lundestad, former non-voting secretary to the Nobel Committee (https://tinyurl.com/yarclup4)

    The committee hoped the award would strengthen Mr Obama.

    Instead, the decision was met with criticism in the US. Many argued he had not had any impact worthy of the award.

    Mr Lundestad, writing in his memoir, Secretary of Peace, said even Mr Obama himself had been surprised.

    "No Nobel Peace Prize ever elicited more attention than the 2009 prize to Barack Obama," Mr Lundestad writes.

    "Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake," he says. "In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for".

What Mr. Lundestad’s book, Secretary of Peace , makes abundantly clear is that the Nobel is given NOT for accomplishments, but strictly for political gain. The book might be worth checking out once it’s on the local lending library’s shelf. (I failed to find it for sale online.) Snopes notes that Lundestad said that nowhere does he write in the book “that it was a mistake to give Obama the Peace Prize.”

    It is interesting to note that Menachem Begin (with Anwar El Sadat) won the Peace Prize for “for the peace treaty concluded between Israel and Egypt

    Peres and Rabin and the terrorist Arafat shared the prize "for their efforts to create peace in the Middle East. (We know how THAT worked out.)

Bottom line

Anyone, other than perhaps Harris-Emhoff, who claims they know what Biden, if he prevails, will do is just guessing. Everything by everyone, possibly even Biden, is strictly speculation.

Biden never has been a leader. Most VPs lack any real authority so Biden cannot honestly be blamed for Obama’s actions or inactions.

If the fraud allegations can be dealt with to Trump’s satisfaction, than Biden can move into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

In the meantime, this scrivener believes it right and proper to assist Biden in setting up a transition team. Team members always can go home when/if the fraud claims are validated.

After thought

Thousands of Trump supporters rallied in D.C. and none of them broke into and looted stores, tore down statues, or otherwise caused havoc.

The LA Blade (https://tinyurl.com/y39bv9h8) which bills itself as "America's LGBT News Source" cited

    Reports indicate there was at least one scuffle between march participants and counter-protesters near Freedom Plaza.

    Additional clashes took place a few hours later near Black Lives Plaza and outside the Capitol Hilton on 16th Street, N.W.

    One incident involved fireworks thrown at a group of Trump supporters who were sitting in a nearby restaurant.

    The Washington Post reported a man was hospitalized after he was stabbed in the back during a melee that broke out a few blocks east of the White House.

    The Metropolitan Police Department in an email to the Washington Blade said 10 people were arrested for firearm violations, simple assault, no permit, assault on a police officer and affray/disorderly. NBC Washington reports at least 20 people have been arrested.

The Blade conveniently did not identify if the arrested were Trump supporters or anti-Trump protesters.

The Blade DID report that

    Members of the Proud Boys, a white nationalist group the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as a hate group, and Gays for Trump participated in the event. Texas Congressman Louie Gohmert is among those who spoke.

Tell me again that the Proud Boys deserve the SPLC’s label as a “hate group.”


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Speculation

Monday, October 26, 2020

Opuscula

Nobel presidents:
Some for nothing,
Nothing for some

Dry Bones by Kirschen for 26 Oct 2020 (https://tinyurl.com/y6yqdj43)

SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO WONDER: Are prizes worth the paper on which they are printed?

For example: A former U.S. president receives the Nobel Peace Prize early in his term, according to the Nobel committee (https://tinyurl.com/y5wb4uf7) “"for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."

Mind, (citing the Nobel award, ibid.) “Barack H. Obama, the 44th President of the United States, had been in power for less than eight months when he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009. Among the reasons it gave, the Nobel Committee lauded Obama for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples". Emphasis was also given to his support – in word and deed - for the vision of a world free from nuclear weapons.

    Rhetorical Question: Did he accomplish any of those things during eight years in office?

For example: Another U.S. president managed to forge peace agreements between

    Israel and
    *  United Arab Emirates
    *  Bahrain
    *  Sudan
    Between Kosovo and Serbia
    Reduced tensions between North Korea and the world.
    Reduced contributions to organizations that promote hatred and terrorism.

Never mind that the previous administration — led by a Nobel Peace Prize winner —

    *  Failed to manage a peace agreement with ANY antagonists
    *  Exacerbated conflicts
    *  Refused to deal with North Korea despite its on-going threats to world peace
    *  Bolstered Iran’s capability to make a nuclear weapon, ignoring Iran’s threats to all nations in the Middle East
    *  Encouraged and provided financial support to terrorists (PLO/PFLP, Hamas/Islamic Jihad) by keeping U.S. taxpayer aid flowing to the terrorist “leadership.”

 

FOR THE RECORD, the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize went to the UN's World Food Program.

According to Wikipedia (https://tinyurl.com/yy6fjhwf),

    The World Food Programme (WFP) is the food-assistance branch of the United Nations. It is the world's largest humanitarian organization, the largest one focused on hunger and food security, and the largest provider of school meals. Founded in 1961, it is headquartered in Rome and has offices in 80 countries. As of 2019, it served 97 million people in 88 countries, the largest since 2012, with two-thirds of its activities conducted in conflict zones.

Most assuredly the UN’s program — largely funded by U.S. taxpayers under the current administration — is a worthwhile function.

But compared to peace making? Compared to reducing the chance that people will be murdered in the name of religion or race or any other excuse?

As my Second Born, a computer wizard, would opine: “That doesn’t compute.”

Not the first Nobel embarrassment

According to both the BBC (https://tinyurl.com/yarclup4) and the New York Post (https://tinyurl.com/y264flh7),

    Geir Lundestad told the AP news agency that the committee hoped the award would strengthen Obama.

    Instead, the decision was met with criticism in the US. Many argued he had not had any impact worthy of the award.

    Lundestad, writing in his memoir, Secretary of Peace, said even Obama himself had been surprised.

    "Even many of Obama's supporters believed that the prize was a mistake," he says. "In that sense the committee didn't achieve what it had hoped for".

    Some Obama’s advisers decided the honor could not be refused. But as ridicule rained down on the committee for handing a peacemaker’s award to a man who was ordering drone strikes on civilians overseas, the White House grew increasingly hesitant, dithering for weeks over how much of the traditional three-day awards gala he would attend.

Bottom line: the Prize committee had “high hopes” that failed to develop.

The Prize committee also gave the 1994 Peace Prize jointly to Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin of Israel and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. It ignored Wm. Jefferson Clinton (Dem) who brokered the deal.

    Rhetorical Question: How did that work out?

Is the Prize committee showing bias?

Democrat presidents get it.

Republican presidents don’t get it.

President Nixon, who opened China and got the U.S. out of Vietnam was nominated, but Henry Kissinger got the award. Only the Prize committee knows why a subordinate (Kissinger) won the prize while the boss (Nixon) was ignored. (Kissinger did deserve a Frequent Flier award.)

According to ThoughtCo. (https://tinyurl.com/y6gjgk9z) , three presidents and one vice-president were honored by the Prize committee:

    Theodore Roosevelt (GOP), who was in office from 1901-09, was awarded the prize in 1906 "for his successful mediation to end the Russo-Japanese war and for his interest in arbitration, having provided the Hague arbitration court with its very first case.”

    Woodrow Wilson (Dem), who was in office from 1913-21, was awarded the prize in 1919 for founding the League of Nations, the predecessor to the United Nations.

    Jimmy Carter (Dem), who served one term from 1977 to 1981, was awarded the prize in 2002 "for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development."

    Vice President Al Gore (Dem) won the prize in 2007 for his work in researching and disseminating information about climate change.

Consider for a moment how the UN, nee’ League of Nations, has prevented conflicts; the “international conflicts” avoided by Carter, and the great progress made combating climate change during Democrat administrations.

Teddy (Roosevelt) won the prize for “successful mediation” of one war (that the Japanese actually won with their surprise attack on Port Arthur — a tactic they would use again on 7 December 1941 at Pearl Harbor.)

In comparison, President Trump managed to arrange peace or “normalization” agreements between multiple countries in the Middle East and in Europe. To paraphrase the “Soup nazi” from Seinfeld (https://tinyurl.com/zwblsg9), “No prize for you (Trump).

    Here’s a thought: In how many peace — or even “non-aggression” — treaties has Joe Biden been involved in his 47 years in Washington, including eight as Prize winner Obama’s vice president?

Republican Ronald Reagan did not garner the Peace prize, but Communist Mikhail Gorbachev won the honor for “for his leading role in the peace process which today characterizes important parts of the international community.” (https://tinyurl.com/yxsgab25)

Dry Bones by Kirschen for 25 Oct 2020
(https://tinyurl.com/y6yqdj43)


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Embarrassed

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Opuscula

College:
Who needs it?
Not the voters

The Democrats said they wanted to eliminate the Electoral College.

The Republicans said they wanted to eliminate the Electoral College.

Yet, the Electoral College still exists.

Why?

 

According to History.com (https://tinyurl.com/y27u3wz9)
    Five times in history, presidential candidates have won the popular vote but lost the Electoral College.

History.com continues,

    Among the many thorny questions debated by the delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, one of the hardest to resolve was how to elect the president. The Founding Fathers debated for months, with some arguing that Congress should pick the president and others insistent on a democratic popular vote.

    Their compromise is known as the Electoral College.

As with most compromises, rather than everyone winning, everyone — in particular five politicians — lost.

The fear

Still citing History.com,

    First, they thought 18th-century voters lacked the resources to be fully informed about the candidates, especially in rural outposts. Second, they feared a headstrong “democratic mob” steering the country astray. And third, a populist president appealing directly to the people could command dangerous amounts of power.

While that could happen in 2020, given the presence of extremists on all sides and the number of unsolicited absentee ballots — blame it on Covid-19 — that may, or may not, be cast by unregistered persons or persons who are registered but not citizens — being able to register on-line without having to prove citizenship actually is no worse than registering in person and not having to prove citizenship.

    Actually, in some states more proof of citizenship is required to get a driver’s license!

Knowledge of issues

Newspaper, tv, radio — all carry advertisements promoting candidates and issues.

That is not to claim that the advertisements are truthful or that either the candidates or those supporting them or specific issues are honest. Even “fact checkers” can be biased and check facts that best support their position.

    Yes, I believe the media is biased; some more blatantly than others.

There is a plethora of information available. There is no excuse for a voter to claim ignorance of a candidate. Have email? The candidates’ supporters will find you. Have text messaging? Ditto. It doesn’t matter if you are a registered Republican; the Democrats still will try to get your vote. I’m sure the Republicans are no better.

Perhaps there should be a test before a voter is handed a ballot to see if he or she actually KNOWS who and what is on the ballot.

    Yes, I know that would immediately be declared unconstitutional.

Technology

Today, October 2020, most voting at precinct places is electronic.

Voters show up at the polling place and prove they are registered to vote by providing some evidence; often a driver’s license. The poll worker compares the evidence to a list; if they match, the voter gets a ballot.

Voters mark their ballots and carry them to a scanner that records their votes.

The scanners are “dumped” into a computer at the Supervisor of Elections (SOE) or similar office and added to the output of other scanners at other polling places.

Mail-in and drop off ballots are scanned at “Election Central,” the Supervisor of Elections’ office.

As with polling places, there are supposed to be “poll watchers” to assure everything is on the up-and-up; kosher.

The biggest weakness in the mail-in ballots is the U.S. Post Office (USPS).

There is no guarantee that a ballot stuck in a voter’s letter box will be collected by the carrier; there is no guarantee that a ballot dropped in a USPS drop box or a Post Office branch will be delivered to the SOE, especially if the ballot is handled by a mail sorting facility between the time it is collected at the drop box or Post Office branch and the time is it supposed to be delivered to the SOE.

    This scrivener has particularly bad mail service; despite complaints, Civil Service and the union protect the carrier.

Voters with mail-in ballots have the option of dropping them off at a local polling place once early voting commences, or taking the ballots to an SOE secure drop box. Both ways avoid putting the ballots into USPS hands.

Vote early and often

Incumbents generally are more concerned with cheating by their opponents’ followers.

With lax — sometimes non-existent — requirements to prove citizenship, the suspicion is that illegals will be casting ballots.

The Heritage Foundation Election Fraud Database (https://tinyurl.com/ycyn6t2z) presents a sampling of recent proven instances of election fraud from across the country. This database is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list. It does not capture all cases and certainly does not capture reported instances that are not investigated or prosecuted.

The database lists 1,298 “proven cases of voter fraud,” but fails to specify WHEN the fraud was discovered making is less useful.

History, unfortunately, has some (in)famous voter fraud.

The City Journal site (https://tinyurl.com/y3y45euf), records that

    Nowhere did voter fraud have a more notorious record than in Tammany-era New York. Tammany Hall's ruthless efficiency in manufacturing votes—especially during the zenith of its power in the second half of the nineteenth century—is legendary. At the time, America didn't yet have privacy-protecting voting machines or official government ballots, so Tammany fixers could ensure that voters would cast ballots as promised. Vote riggers would simply give people pre-marked ballots and watch as they deposited them into the voting box.

The people of Chicago might dispute that.

The Block Club Chicago site (https://tinyurl.com/y654l7m7) offers

    Chicago is famous for its history of people voting from the grave and for helping President John F. Kennedy “steal” the 1960 election. (JFK beat Richard Nixon by 9,000 votes in Illinois by capturing what some considered a suspiciously high 450,000 advantage in Cook County.)

    Mayor Anton Cermak, the first in an unbroken stream of Democratic mayors since 1931, created what would became known as the infamous “Democratic Machine,” said Bob Crawford, a now-retired journalist who covered city politics for decades. The Machine ensured voters picked the right candidates, and the people who worked in it weren’t shy about using money, bribes or fake identities to get votes for Democrats.

Tactics may have changed, but the prospect of voter fraud is once again a significant consideration. Instead of registering names from tombstones, illegal aliens may be voting thanks both to unsolicited ballots and voter registrars who don’t demand proof of citizenship.

Both WUSA9 (https://tinyurl.com/y4mh8hbp) and WTOP (https://tinyurl.com/y59nympj) report that A half-million unsolicited absentee applications cause confusion in Virginia. That’s just one state. Similar situations have been reported elsewhere.

House decides

If neither presidential candidate receives the required 270 votes, the House of Representatives elects the president.

For the 2020 election, given the House’s Democrat majority, Harris-Emhoff will become the first female president of the United States.

    I predict that Joe Biden will not complete a full term in office. His age and health are an issue and if that doesn’t force his capitulation, his party will drum up a way to get him declared unfit for office. I could be wrong.

The question is: WHEN will the House get the job, if ever?

There is so much speculation that voter fraud will be rampant that who ever looses the election likely will challenge many votes. At this point, it seems likely that the winner will be named sometime in December.


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Embarrassed

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Opuscula

A Sanders clone?
A little voting history
Kamala Harris-Emhoff

JUST ABOUT EVERYONE KNOWS JOE BIDEN’s voting record and something about his activities — or lack thereof — in the previous administration.

But Sen. Kamala Harris-Emhoff is another matter.

What is her voting record. The REAL record, not just some excerpts, are available online at several locations. 

ACCORDING TO RollCall.com1

    Kamala Harris’ arrival in the Senate coincided with the start of the Trump administration in 2017, and the Democratic vice presidential candidate’s legislative record shows her to be a reliable soldier of the opposition (Democrat) party.

Because of that reality, there’s been limited opportunity for crossover voting for Joe Biden’s choice of running mate, but that doesn’t mean there’s been none. Her party unity score, calculated by CQ Roll Call as the percentage of votes cast in which a lawmaker votes the same way as a majority of the members of their caucus, is north of 99 percent.

Notable times that she has dissented with the party include her 2019 vote against a Middle East security package that warned against “precipitous withdrawal” of U.S. military forces in Syria and Afghanistan. She was one of 22 Democratic caucus members to cast a no vote.

Both the Harris Senate Voting Record2 and GovTrack.us3 track her vote line-by-line.

JustFacts.VoteSmart.org 4 also provides a vote-by-vote report.

Belying the claim that she is a Sanders' clone, ProPublica compares her voting record, all eight pages, with Sanders5 and, for comparison, that of Ted Cruz,6 a solid Conservative.

Go to the left, the left, the left

The VP hopeful is truly a libertine. A bullet display of Harris-Emhoff’s voting record (below) vs. the rest of the Senate puts her almost off the left side of the chart.

 

Harris-Emhoff voting history compared to all other senators. (GovTrack https://tinyurl.com/y682u58m)

 The same source, GovTrack, also provides both a chart and list of the votes Harris-Emhoff missed. From Jan 2017 to Aug 2020, Harris missed 271 of 1,184 roll call votes, which is 22.9%. This is much worse than the median of 1.7% among the lifetime records of senators currently serving. The chart below reports missed votes over time.

 

Harris-Emhoff missed votes. (GovTrack https://tinyurl.com/y682u58m)

 GovTrack does not ask the senators why they failed to vote on an issue.

The senator regularly objects to almost all Trump nominees. That is her most consistent vote.

The REAL Question

Given Biden’s obvious cognizance issues; issues that cannot be denied since they were recorded for all to see — again and again — and Biden’s age, is Harris-Emhoff really,/I> running for president?

Is she eligible to be president?

Apparently someone gave Trump some bad information when he is alleged to have suggested Harris-Emhoff is not eligible to be president. Unlike Obama whose birth location is at least questionable, she most assuredly is eligible to president according to the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution adopted on July 9, 1868 that states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside".

Wikipedia6 explains:

    The Fourteenth Amendment provides that children born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction become American citizens at birth. At the time of the amendment's passage, President Andrew Johnson and three senators, including Trumbull, the author of the Civil Rights Act, asserted that both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment would confer citizenship to children born to foreign nationals in the United States. Senator Edgar Cowan of Pennsylvania had a decidedly different opinion. Some scholars dispute whether the Citizenship Clause should apply to the children of unauthorized immigrants today, as "the problem ... did not exist at the time". In the 21st century, Congress has occasionally discussed passing a statute or a constitutional amendment to reduce the practice of "birth tourism", in which a foreign national gives birth in the United States to gain the child's citizenship.

The clause's meaning with regard to a child of immigrants was tested in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). The Supreme Court held that under the Fourteenth Amendment, a man born within the United States to Chinese citizens who have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States and are carrying out business in the United States—and whose parents were not employed in a diplomatic or other official capacity by a foreign power—was a citizen of the United States. Subsequent decisions have applied the principle to the children of foreign nationals of non-Chinese descent.

According to the Foreign Affairs Manual, which is published by the State Department, "Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the [Fourteenth] Amendment."

Lack of knowledge of the Constitution and its amendments, especially when information is so easily acquired, is a disgrace, all the more so when incorrect information is provided to a president (or other CEO).

If Trump really said Harris-Emhoff is not eligible to be president, he once again was embarrassed by a careless flunky. Still, as Harry S Truman noted, “the buck stops” at the president’s desk; in the end, he has to take responsibility. (Perhaps it was a “Biden moment”?)


Sources

1. RollCall.com: https://tinyurl.com/y2ss9ml2

2. Voting Record: https://tinyurl.com/y7sfj6yr

3. GovTrack: https://tinyurl.com/y682u58m

4. JustFacts.VoteSmart.org: https://tinyurl.com/y2oseh7k

5. Emhoff vs. Sanders: https://tinyurl.com/y6nwbqnn

5. Emhoff vs. Cruz: https://tinyurl.com/y59vbzrb

6. 14th Amendment: https://tinyurl.com/yxtebjng

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Kamala Harris

Thursday, July 23, 2020

Opuscula

Biden ignores both
Facts and handlers’
Advice on U.S. history

Update for 24 July 2020

U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX-01) calls on Congress to ban any political organization or party that has ever held a public position supporting slavery or the Confederate States of America, citing the racist history of the Democratic party. (https://youtu.be/lRR5IQmMXEU)


JOE BIDEN, THE DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, on Wednesday called President Trump the country’s first racist to be elected to the White House.

The Washington Post reported that Biden said that Trump frequently refers to the pandemic as the “China virus,” saying, “the way he deals with people based on the color of their skin, their national origin, where they’re from, is absolutely sickening.”

“No sitting president has ever done this,” Biden said. “Never, never, never. No Republican president has done this. No Democratic president. We’ve had racists, and they’ve existed, they’ve tried to get elected president. He’s the first one that has.”1

 

 

TO ITS CREDIT, the left-leaning WashPost did challenge Biden’s remark:

    Though Biden calls Trump the first racist to be president, history shows the United States has had leaders who either were openly racist, such as enslavers, used racist language, expressed racist views, or enacted racist policies.

Symone Sanders, a Biden campaign senior adviser, acknowledged that although Trump isn’t the first racist president, he’s unique in modern history.

“There have been a number of racist American presidents, but Trump stands out — especially in modern history — because he made running on racism and division his calling card and won,” Sanders said.

 

WHO IS A “RACIST”?

Katrina Pierson, a Trump campaign senior adviser, did directly address Biden’s comments, calling them “an insult to the intelligence of black voters” and pointed to remarks Biden has made in the past. Biden last year faced criticism from his Democratic primary opponents when he spoke favorably of his ability to work with segregationist senators, and he once had to apologize for calling Barack Obama “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

There is no question that Trump has called the Covid-19 virus the “Chinese virus.” That is where the virus originated; about that there also is no question. Unlike the mis-named “Spanish Flu”2 of 1918, this malady’s point of origin is correctly identified.

How identifying a killer by its point of origin is “racist” is beyond this scrivener’s comprehension. True, Trump HAS complained that China has taken advantage of the U.S. (under both Democrat and Republican administrations) and, true, Trump has moved to punish China for its behavior; still, as with the “Chinese” flu, the truth is the truth, no matter who speaks it.

    Not all influenza pandemics originate in China, albeit most do start there.

    The “Swine Flu” epidemic originated in Veracruz, Mexico. Health workers traced the virus to a pig farm in this southeastern Mexican state.3

A few “racist” presidents

Martin Van Buren ordered the U.S. Army into the Cherokee Nation. The soldiers rounded up as many Cherokees as they could into temporary stockades and subsequently marched the captives, led by John Ross, to the Indian Territory in 1838 and 1839.4

Chester A. Arthur signed the "Chinese Exclusion Act" passed by Congress in 18825, provided an absolute 10-year moratorium on Chinese labor immigration.

Abraham Lincoln stated, "I am not, nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people, I as much as any man am in favor of the superior position assigned to the white race." (The Emancipation Proclamation did not apply to areas which were loyal to, or controlled by, the Union. Slavery was not actually abolished in the U.S. until the passage of the 13th Amendment which was declared ratified on December 6, 1865.)6 Lincoln's remarks may be why the so-called Black Lives Matter miscreants attempted to deface the Lincoln Monument.

In 1864, Lincoln was president when deportation of the Navajos by the U.S. government occurred when 8,000 Navajos were forcibly relocated to an internment camp in Bosque Redondo, where, under armed guards, more than 3,500 Navajo and Mescalero Apache men, women, and children died from starvation and disease.

Then there was Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

FDR interned thousands of Japanese because they were Japanese. He feared a Fifth Column. (He ALWAYS suspected anyone outside his social set of being part of a Fifth Column.) Being a fair man, he also sent a few Germans and Italians to camp, as well.7 Eleanor Roosevelt, a fierce proponent of civil rights, hoped to change her husband’s mind, but when she brought the subject up with him, he interrupted her and told her never to mention it again.

FDR repeatedly ignored Jewish appeals to accept refugees from the nazis. Initially because he wanted to remain on good trading terms with the nazi government.

According to Rafael Medoff, in his book The Jews Should Keep Quiet, 8

    The U.S. immigration system severely limited the number of German Jews admitted during the nazi years to about 26,000 annually — but even that quota was less than 25% filled during most of the Hitler era, because the Roosevelt administration piled on so many extra requirements for would-be immigrants. For example, starting in 1941, merely leaving behind a close relative in Europe would be enough to disqualify an applicant — on the absurd assumption that the nazis could threaten the relative and thereby force the immigrant into spying for Hitler.

    In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. In 1938, he privately suggested that Jews in Poland were dominating the economy and were therefore to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions “should be definitely limited” so as to “eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.”

Unfortunately, FDR’s anti-Semitism can fill a book — and it did. Portions of the book (ibid.) may be read at https://tinyurl.com/yyez6qye .

The Clintons “Crime Bill Destroyed Our Communities,” a reference to the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which is now considered a disaster because it caused the incarceration rate among the black community to skyrocket. The legislation was such a debacle that Mr. Clinton said last year he regrets signing the bill. But at Thursday’s rally, the former president angrily attempted to justify another Clinton outrage from 1994: Ms. Clinton calling black gang members “super predators” who must be “brought to heel.”9

Bill Clinton10 “has no civil rights policy. He has, in fact, failed to address concretely the issue of racism, and instead has made every effort to distance himself from civil rights advocates.” Herbert Hill 11

Barack Obama12 is a liberal who cannot deal with a conservative, He

    (a) snubbed Israel’s prime minister 13

    (b) gave the PLO/PFLP US$221 million on his last day in office14

Obama’s decision not to block a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements laid bare all the grievances the two men have nursed since shortly after they took office in 2009. For Mr. Netanyahu, it was the final betrayal by a president who was supposed to be an ally but never really was. For Mr. Obama, it was the inevitable result of Mr. Netanyahu’s own stubborn defiance of international concerns with his policies.

Short list

Harry S Truman, of Missouri, did what FDR would not do: he integrated the military. Truman also appointed the first black to a Cabinet position.

Dwight D. Eisenhower, did what FDR would not do; he integrated schools.

Lyndon Baines Johnson of Texas, did what FDR would not do; he created the Great Society. While FDR created a multitude of programs during the depression, most benefited whites; LBJ’s plan was (more or less) color blind.

Richard M. Nixon didn’t particularly like Jews, but despite his Secretary of State, he aided Israel when it needed help.

Geo. Bush appointed Colin Powell as the first black Secretary of State. Condoleezza Rice was the second black Secretary of State; appointed to the post in Bush’s second term.

Is he senile, ignorant, or both?

Something obviously is wrong with a man who neither knows history nor listens to his handlers who (apparently) tried to shield him from this latest gaffe, his latest “foot in mouth” performance.

Trump is not a racist — he has brought more blacks into office than any president before him.

Because he wants to build a wall to keep out illegals, especially drug smugglers and assorted violent criminals, does that make him a racist? Or does that make him an American president trying to uphold the Constitution and protect ALL of America’s citizens.

Has he, like Biden, put his foot in his mouth and said, or tweeted, something unpresidential. Without a doubt.

Is Trump the best man for the office?

No, but he is better than the alternative (Biden).

Americans are facing an election between Tweedledee and Tweedledum.

Unfortunately it also is an election between the rule of law and anarchists; the middle ground is deserted by any and all who might bring reason and civility to the table.

America is in sad straits, difficult times.

There are those — China for example — waiting for America to falter, to become a second class nation such as England and those that populate Europe.

If anyone wants to discuss racism and freedoms, look to China where racism abounds (ask a Muslim) and freedoms do not.

Trump may not be the best candidate, but he is better than the Democrat alternative.

Parting thought

During the campaign, Biden has forgotten Barack Obama’s name repeatedly, proclaimed he was running for Senate, declared that over 150 million people have been killed by gun violence since 2007, confused his wife with his sister, confused Angela Merkel with Margaret Thatcher, and confused Theresa May twice with Margaret Thatcher. He’s issued an endless litany of baffling and embarrassing statements, including, “Tomorrow’s Super Thursday,” “We choose truth over facts,” “Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids,” “Why, why, why, why, why, why, why?” and “We hold these truths to be self-evident: all men and women created by the, go, you know the, you know the thing.”
The Best of Biden: https://youtu.be/1VMKF3lRoqw
More on Biden's faux pas at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzBdBj5QWyY

 


 

Sources

1 Washington Post: https://tinyurl.com/y5axejr5

2. “Spanish flu”: https://tinyurl.com/rmv6v9x

3. “Swine flu”: https://tinyurl.com/y2l6bmyh

4. Van Buren: https://tinyurl.com/yc8p76oy

5. Arthur: https://tinyurl.com/yacyswvt

6. Lincoln: https://tinyurl.com/y37v8l82

7. FDR & Japanese: https://tinyurl.com/yahl2s3g

8. FDR & Jews: The Jews Should Keep Quiet, Rafael Medoff, JPS, ISBN 978-0-8276-1470-30

9. Clintons: https://tinyurl.com/y3fr85g6

10. Clinton: Racism or Realpolitik? www.jstor.com

11. Hill: https://tinyurl.com/y3j7uzfk

12. Obama: https://tinyurl.com/y5rmwyqv

13. Obama & Netanyahu: https://tinyurl.com/yxbpv2et

14: Obama & PLO/PFLP: https://tinyurl.com/y399b8nh

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Presidential Racism

Sunday, September 2, 2018

Opuscula

Poorly timed
Cheap shots

BECAUSE PRESIDENT TRUMP said John McCain was not a hero – Trump NEVER said McCain was a coward, contrary to Democrat lies – McCain’s daughter and a few others used McCain’s lying in state as a bully pulpit to castigate the president.

If the late Arizona senator wanted to, as he claimed, “bring the nation together,” she chose to speak enthusiastically against his hope.

MCCAIN invited political foes to eulogize him, which they did, and specifically did NOT want President Trump at his lying in state.

McCain’s daughter, without naming the president, attacked him by stating:
    We gather here to mourn the passing of American greatness; the real thing," McCain said. "Not cheap rhetoric from men who will never come near the sacrifice he gave so willingly, nor the opportunistic appropriation of those who lived lives of comfort and privilege while he suffered and served."1

Interesting. She could have been reviling invited speakers Obama and Bush. Obama never saw a day of military service and Bush dodged real service by joining the Texas Air National Guard. Obama keeps company with fellow Democrat Wm. Clinton.2

Vice President Pence, like Obama and Clinton, also managed to avoid military service3. Joe Biden “got a draft notice but flunked the physical due to asthma,” according to a 1987 Washington Post profile.

No argument that McCain served in the U.S. Navy as a pilot. Also no argument that being the son and grandson of Navy admirals McCain had “Vitamin P” that helped get several wrecked Navy planes forgiven4 and gained for him special treatment in the Navy.

It is true that McCain refused repatriation (early release) from a Vietnamese prison believing it unfair to other prisoners. There are those who suggest that McCain may have earned the Vietnamese offer due to his father’s position.

If bombing people you cannot identify from a fast moving aircraft is heroic, then John McCain was a hero.

McCain, on return from Vietnam, was promoted to Navy Captain (O-6) and assigned to Washington D.C.5 He and his first wife divorced and he married an Arizona woman whose influential father helped his new son-in-law enter politics.

McCain twice ran for president in GOP primaries.

In 2000, he lost his primary bid to Geo. W. Bush (who he invited to speak at his lying in state.) Bush defeated Al Gore in the infamous “hanging chad” election.

In 2008, after winning a majority of delegates in the Republican primaries, he selected Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate for Vice President.

He lost to Obama in the general elections. It might be suggested that the election was race vs. sex (Obama the mulatto and Palin the woman.)

In both cases, McCain kept his seat in the Senate.

Interestingly, while McCain supported normalization with Vietnam, he was against President Trump’s efforts to denuclearize North Korea. McCain’s daughter, who vilified Trump at the lying in state,

    slammed President Trump on Tuesday (6/12/18) for his "buddy-buddy" meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, whom she denounced as a "dictator."6

    The cohost of ABC’s “The View” and daughter of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said from her bully pulpit that, though she was initially on board with the summit, she was disturbed by the symbolism of both nations’ flags flying together in Singapore.

    “We are not the same,” she continued. “[Kim’s North Korea] is completely and utterly the closest thing to Hitler’s Germany that exists in modern time. My problem was how far it went with the buddy-buddy, and there was no talk whatsoever of the human rights violations going on in that country.”

No doubt her description of North Korea’s government is correct, but someone had to open communications with China (Nixon) and look what that got the U.S. Her father pressed for normalization with Vietnam despite its treatment of him and other U.S. POWs. The U.S. still deals with Saudi Arabia – in fact Obama bowed to a Saudi price (but he bowed to many people).7 It also deals with a host of undemocratic governments that suppress human dignity. The only “excuse” is that no progress can be expected if there is no communication between governments.

You can’t catch a fish unless you go where the fish live.

I understand McCain’s daughter’s pain at the loss of her father, but using the lying in state as an opportunity to castigate her father’s sometime political opponents was unfortunate and in bad taste. For once Trump showed some restraint (something he should practice more often).



Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/yawg6jvp

2. http://tinyurl.com/qjumhq5

3. http://tinyurl.com/y7xvyppz

4. http://tinyurl.com/y959bgwp

5. http://tinyurl.com/y8fu22nr

6. http://tinyurl.com/ybpvmxsu

7. http://tinyurl.com/ya7983kz

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Poor timing

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

Opuscula

Media endorsements:
Current or outdated?

I NEVER GAVE IT MUCH THOUGHT until this political season, but media endorsements sometimes outlive their time.

We have a tightening race to determine what Democrat will stand against a Republican for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Since the race is in my congressional district, I find myself watching the candidates’ advertisements.

The incumbent, who has been in office so long she no longer is responsive to her constituents, is running advertisements that claim the local newspaper – we still have a very active press in my area – endorsed her; praised her good works.

Her opponent also includes endorsements from the same newspaper – and others. The difference is, and this is what prompts this effort, the challenger includes the date of the endorsement and all dates are current. The incumbent somehow fails to include the dates the endorsements (allegedly) were made.

Interestingly, the incumbent grudgingly debated the challenger one time, and her ads fail to tell the voters what she will do on their behalf. (Making roll call votes in the House would be an improvement over her last term.) She whines about Republicans and Democrats, some “from out of state,” funneling funds to her opponent and she stands firmly behind her president.

Her raison d’être, she tells all who will listen, is to defeat the GOP presidential candidate. Not exactly a reason to vote for her in the Democrat primary.

The challenger naturally chastises the incumbent for her voting record and claims both the president and vp endorse him. Unless you support Washington’s current policies, that endorsement is enough to make you vote for whomever the GOP will field in November.

Given that the incumbent recently was pushed out of her job as DNC chair due to an email scandal– and quickly found a job with the Clinton campaign with its own email scandal – Democrat voters should seriously consider both candidates’ qualifications for the House seat. Honesty and truthfulness being two criteria

My district will not lose any political clout if the challenger or the GOP candidate is elected to replace the incumbent. She gave up any prestige when she took on the role as DNC chair – and abandoned her responsibilities as our (unresponsive) representative to congress. (To be fair, Florida’s junior senator also has a disgraceful voting record; worse, he denigrated the U.S. Senate and now decries that he was misunderstood; he really likes his job as a senator.)


Friday, January 16, 2015

Notables notably absent

Has U.S. cowed
To Islamist threat

 

QUICK - WHO WAS THE HIGHEST RANKING AMERICAN AT THE PARIS MARCH?

What is Obama?

    No.

Was it Biden?

    No.

Was it Kerry?

    Again, no.

The ranking American who managed to make it to the march is the U.S. Ambassaador to France, Jane Hartley, and she didn't even make it to the front row. Trying to find America's representative to France in the crowd of dignitaries from 40 countries AND Abu Mazen from the so called Palestinian Authority is akin to searching for both Waldo and Carmen Sandiego.


YOU AN SPECULATE why Obama felt thousands of Frenchmen could be wrong to take umbrage to Islamists murdering French citizens.

Perhaps he failed to realize that not all of the dead were Jews.

Perhaps he was miffed because a similar gathering of "world leaders" did not happen after either the first or the second Muslim attack on the World Trade buildings, although that was not on his watch.

Perhaps he was assuring that respect for the United States continues to fall to new lows.

Or perhaps the poll numbers had yet to arrive.

Maybe if the French had decided to hold their parade in Hawaii he would have been front and center.

Whatever caused him to make such a disastrous decision is known only to him and, perhaps, Michelle.