Showing posts with label Paul Harvey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Harvey. Show all posts

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Opuscula

We need Paul Harvey
To tell the world
The Rest of the Story

AND NOW YOU KNOW … THE REST OF THE STORY

Those were the words with which commentator Paul Harvey1(right) always ended his radio program.

We need to hear “the rest of the story” on many stories we hear on tv and read in what’s left of the press. (Getting the full story from biased blogs is an impossibility.)

 

 

IT USED TO BE, back when this scrivener was a newspaper printer and later reporter than editor, that newspapers could be depended upon to give complete stories — ALL the facts — while most people realized both radio and tv only had time for headlines. Radio talk shows and “in depth” tv coverage too often was slanted to suit the deep pockets behind the program.

Unfortunately, newspapers are disappearing and newspaper readers are scarce.

Magazines that once crowded shelves in news kiosks and stores and offered differing points of view are, as with newspapers, a footnote in history.

 

BLM – really?

This entry is prompted by the GEORGE FLOYD murder at the hands of a Minneapolis cop. (The cop since has been arrested and charged with second degree murder2; three other cops are facing charges as accessories.)

As a reporter I learned to withhold judgment until both sides of the story are told.

It LOOKS like the cop had his knee on Floyd’s neck for some time.

Reports state that Floyd repeatedly complained he was unable to breathe.

I wasn’t there, so as far as this scrivener is concerned, until all the evidence is produced — on all sides — everything is “hearsay,” cell phone images not withstanding.

The media, getting its information from what sources — so far unnamed — reported that while Floyd had run-ins with the law in the past, he was now trying to redeem himself.

Going on less than a full accounting and background, protesters hit the streets in a number of cities and cartoonists around the world used their pens to attack America as “racist” and filled with “white extremists.”

Unfortunately, the more-or-less peaceful protesters were joined by opportunist looters and others taking an opportunity to destroy anything and everything. (What justifies spray painting obscenities on a synagogue in Los Angeles? It happened “in the name of George Floyd.”)

 

AND NOW another version of the George Floyd story is being told.

By a black woman, or, if you prefer, a “woman of color.”

Candice Owens posted a 17-minute video on Facebook3 presenting additional information and explaining why she does not support the protesters.

She does not give the cops a free pass, but she provides a great deal of background both on Floyd’s recidivistic proclivities and his multiple incarcerations up until the time of his latest arrest.

According to Owens, the stories that Floyd was making a new life for himself are not entirely true.

It is worth listening to her Facebook comments — assuming Facebook’s censors don’t remove it — to hear another side to the George Floyd story.

As with the protesters’ allegations, Owen’s report has the same “hearsay” value.

All the facts need to be brought forth by aggressive lawyers, both for the state and the family.

 

Blacks killing blacks

If people want to protest something, protest black-on-black murders.

Protest the Sergeant Schultz4 (right) attitude of “I know NOTHING” when the cops come around asking questions in order to catch the shooters.

Dade County (Miami FL and environs) has almost daily black-on-black killings and woundings. Many are indiscriminate; toddlers are as likely to be shot as seniors in their sleep.

Other cities, e.g., Chicago, are worse.

If a white person shots a black person, Al Sharpton and others of his ilk immediately are on the scene and in front of the ubiquitous tv cameras.

If a black person shoots a black person, the Al Sharptons are nowhere to be found.

    If the video at https://youtu.be/ylAh9VjLTiU is any indication, black lives matter only to Caucasians. A young Washington (D.C.) woman tells a group or mostly white demonstrators to “go to Chicago” where there are more black-on-black killings.
 

Good cop, bad cop

Over the years I have known a lot of cops, “Law Enforcement Officers” or LEOs.

My first born is a LEO.

For many years I was assigned to the police and fire beat (as well as other things).

I’ve known good cops.

I’ve known cops who should never have been given a badge and a gun.

I’ve seen cops go out of their way to help people — without regard to race or ethnicity.

I’ve seen cops who simply had ugly, “in your face” personalities.

Most LEOs are somewhere in between.

Often the department’s top cop (chief of police, sheriff) determines which way the department’s LEOs interact with the public.

I have seen abuse heaped on LEOs just because they are LEOs. (I also have seen abuse of men and women in the military just because they were in the military.)

It is my understanding that the Minneapolis police department now is being investigated by a federal agency. Given the political climate in America today, no one will be satisfied with the investigation’s outcome. Still, an outside review is in order.

 

Bottom line

The bottom line is that the George Floyd incident never should have happened.

The cop should have managed to restrain Floyd in another manner. (I understand Floyd already was in handcuffs. All hearsay.) There were at least three other LEOs present.

Not the first to die

Eric Garner died on 17 July 2014 after New York City cop Daniel Pantaleo put him in a choke hold while arresting him.5, 6

On December 3, 2014, a Richmond County grand jury decided not to indict Pantaleo. This decision stirred public protests and rallies, with charges of police brutality made by protesters.

Pantaleo was fired on August 19, 2019, more than five years after Garner's death.

Six years seems ample time to train LEOs to find a way OTHER THAN deadly force to subdue a person, even a person on drugs and endangering everyone in the area. Neither Floyd nor Garner were armed combatants threatening to kill the LEOs.

LEOs make mistakes Cops, especially inexperienced cops, make mistakes. Some can be fatal. An area LEO killed a mentally ill man in Miami Gardens FL who attacked the cops with a broom stick.7

A cop in North Miami Beach FL wounded a mentally ill man’s caretaker because he thought the mentally ill man had a weapon.8 The “weapon” was a toy truck.

Caretaker accidentally shot in North Miami Beach FL


 



 

Sources

1. Paul Harvey: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Harvey

2. Murder definitions: https://tinyurl.com/yd36au5t

3. Candice Owens: https://tinyurl.com/y8m3du7d

4. John Banner: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Banner

5. Eric Garner: https://tinyurl.com/puh38da

6. Eric Garner: https://tinyurl.com/y7dv8n77

7. Miami Gardens: https://tinyurl.com/y9obj2t2

8. North Miami: https://tinyurl.com/y73f58wq

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Paul Harvey

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Opuscula

Must everything be
All white or all black?
Where are the grays?

 

BERNIE SANDERS, who by his own admission is a Democrat Socialist — more leftist Democrat or Socialist? — is being taken to task by Republicans for stating a fact: Fidel Castro made education a focal point of his regime.

Although I am not a fan of Sen. Sanders, what he said about Castro is true.

Sen. Sanders, to the best of my knowledge, never said Castro was a nice guy or that his government was good to, or for, the Cuban people.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO FIND SOMETHING positive to say about almost anyone.

    Tomás de Torquemada, Hitler, and Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer are notable exceptions to that generality.

It may not be popular among Democrats, but President Trump HAS improved the economy and HAS reduced unemployment and HAS brought back jobs to the U.S.

It may not be popular among Republicans, but ex-president Obama DID push through a health plan and DID bring about the destabilizing Arab Spring that toppled governments throughout the Middle East.

 

Gray (grey) areas

Rarely is anyone 100 percent this or 100% that.

There always are “exceptions to the rule” that muddy our perceptions.

Given the reality of this, why are we so quick to condemn someone who even suggests that someone might have a redeeming feature?

In Israel, there are many who claim that all “Palestinians” just want to murder Israelis. Yet, during forest fire season, “Palestinians” help Israelis put out fires. It doesn’t make the headlines, but it happens. On the other side of the coin, there are “Palestinians” who are taught all Israelis are monsters, when in reality many “Palestinian” lives are saved in Israeli hospitals.

    Since, unlike the “Palestinians,” Israelis include Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others, equating “Israelis” only with “Jews” is not accurate.

 

Sensationalizing the norm

The media, left, right, and in between, seems to have slipped from reporting the facts sans emotion to sensationalizing almost everything.

It IS what is said — written — and HOW it is written that determines how a reasonable reader responds.

I doubt any internet gazetteer can write a “straight” news story sans hyperbole. The “right” is no better or worse than the “left.” There seems to be no “middle” when it comes to politics. Even this blog if given a close read will show a slight bias.

Perhaps we have become accustomed to what used to be called “tabloid headlines.” Not necessary accurate, but bound to get the potential reader’s attention. Most of us get our “news” from tv that mimics the tabloids.

 

Half truths

Worse, by far, than tabloid headlines are one-sided reports. Half truths are no better than full lies.

Police shoot man in front of his house

The headline may be 100 percent accurate, but what is missing is WHY the cops fired their guns.

Even in the “old days” of real newspapers where headline writers were limited by available space, good editors demanded honest headlines.

    As a newspaper man I used to break my head getting headlines to fit AND be complete. I loved the challenge.

We are cursed with poorly written biased headlines and poorly written biased “news” copy.

We are left with half-truths and distortions of facts.

Fidel Castro WAS a dictator who owed the U.S. for its help over-throwing the Batista regime. (So much for “influencing elections.”)

John Kennedy put an embargo in place to prevent importation of Cuban products … AFTER he laid in a large supply of his favorite Cuban cigars.

There used to be a radio program featuring Paul Harvey (right). Mr. Harvey always ended the program with the comment “Now you know (pause) the rest of the story.

Sen., Sanders was correct in his statement about Castro. A good reporter should have dug a little bit to find out what else the senator said about the despot. That would have provided a complete story to make Paul Harvey proud.





PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Where are the grays?