Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bernie Sanders. Show all posts

Sunday, March 8, 2020

Opuscula

Who is the real
Joe Biden who
Wants your vote

 

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S PRE-PRIMARY bloodletting is over and only two candidates are left standing.

The party faithful have a choice: Socialist Bernie (“Feel the Bern”) Sanders or Joe (“Foot in Mouth”) Biden.

The Democrats have a choice and its candidates are very different from each other.

 

A LITTLE HISTORY on the former senator and former two-term Obama VP.

 

Joe Biden, Obama’s point man for almost everything

Margaret Talev of McClatchy Newspapers writes:

  • Meeting with prominent deficit and tax policy experts as President Barack Obama seeks bipartisan agreements on both fronts.
  • Zipping through Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq on a whirlwind war-policy tour.

(https://tinyurl.com/udc978f)

How did any of those “point man” efforts work out?

  • In Egypt, following his boss’ “Arab Spring” that threw many Muslim countries into turmoil, Biden told PBS' Jim Lehrer that Mubarak (despite protests against him at the time) "has been an ally of ours in a number of things" and "I would not refer to him as a dictator," angering Egyptian activists. Mubarak was ousted and Egypt’s current dictator is Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil el-Sisi.
  • U.S. troops still are in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq.
  • U.S. troops still are being murdered in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq.

Did Obama place Biden as “point man” to escape blame rightly his for the failures in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq?

Regardless, U.S. soldiers are still in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iraq, and el-Sisi is in control of Egypt, trying to fend off the Islamic Brotherhood and other Iran-funded foes.

 

Obama praises Biden for Gun Control

In the shocked aftermath of Sandy Hook, the president asked vice-president Joe Biden to lead a taskforce to evaluate what could be done. He came back with a set of concrete proposals, including four major legislative areas of change and 23 executive orders.

But, almost three years later, progress appears stalled and the relentless carnage continues unabated.

Source: The Guardian, undated but “more than four years old” (https://tinyurl.com/v2g76ww)

Joe Biden has taken on the National Rifle Association (NRA) on the national stage and won – twice. In 1993, he shepherded through Congress the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which established the background check system that has since kept more than 3 million firearms out of dangerous hands. In 1994, Biden – along with Senator Dianne Feinstein – secured the passage of 10-year bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

    The Act was named after James Brady, who was shot and wounded by John Hinckley Jr. during an attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981. The original legislation was introduced into the House of Representatives by Representative Charles E. Schumer in March 1991, but was never brought to a vote. The bill was reintroduced by Rep. Schumer on February 22, 1993 and the final version was passed on November 11, 1993.

    The ban expired in 2004.

Joe Biden also knows how to make progress on reducing gun violence using executive action. After the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, President Obama tasked Vice President Biden with developing both legislative proposals and executive actions to make our communities safer. As a result of this effort, the Obama-Biden Administration took more than two dozen actions, including narrowing the so-called “gun show loophole,” increasing the number of records in the background check system, and expanding funding for mental health services.

Source: https://joebiden.com/gunsafety/

    In 2020, guns still are sold at gun shows sans criminal and mental health records checks.

But, "During my 12 and a half years as a member of this (Senate) body, I have never believed that additional gun control or federal registration of guns would reduce crime. I am convinced that a criminal who wants a firearm can get one through illegal, nontraceable, unregistered sources, with or without gun control."

Source: NBC News (https://tinyurl.com/y4xpm22q)

Six weeks after their reelection, the president put Joe Biden in charge of the most serious push for gun control in decades, sparked by the massacre of children at Sandy Hook Elementary. It seemed like the moment when national outrage might lead to congressional action.

Biden did not deliver.

Four months after Biden took on the mission, a modest measure to require expanded background checks died on the Senate floor.

POLITICO interviews with more than a dozen people involved in the effort show that Biden made several strategic missteps that delayed action and may have sacrificed the emotional pull that offered a chance to break a historic logjam. He urged grieving families who wanted to take their case to Capitol Hill to go home, trying to protect them from difficult conversations.

Source: Politico (https://tinyurl.com/txdms9p)

 

Education and Racial Equality

Per EdWeek,com, Former Vice President Joe Biden, who last week made his entrance into a crowded Democratic field of 2020 presidential candidates, has a K-12 record that touches on several issues, although he never made education policy one of his signature issues during his lengthy tenure in Washington.

Biden, who served as Delaware's senator for 36 years prior to joining President Barack Obama's White House in 2009, was a fan of the No Child Left Behind Act in its early days but later soured on the landmark federal education law.

Biden’s views about race and education from several decades ago have also re-emerged in headlines. The Washington Post in March highlighted Biden’s opposition to busing as a means to promote school integration during the 1970s. “I don’t feel responsible for the sins of my father and grandfather. I feel responsible for what the situation is today, for the sins of my own generation,” Biden said in 1975. “And I’ll be damned if I feel responsible to pay for what happened 300 years ago.”

Source: https://tinyurl.com/v6wys2q

 

Ukraine

Hunter Biden’s leveraging of his father’s political connections appear to be routine practice. While his father was the Obama administration’s point-man on Ukraine in 2014, Hunter Biden was hired to serve on the board of a Ukrainia, an energy company making at least $50,000 a month despite no prior experience in the industry.

A Federalist analysis of Hunter Biden’s pay (https://tinyurl.com/ssp8cdc) reveals just how much the former vice president’s son was being showered in excess compensation. Hunter Biden was paid at least twice the amount of board members at comparable corporations. At Exxon Mobil, a global energy company dwarfing Burisma in size and earnings, its board members only made little more than half of Hunter Biden’s reported payout.

Hunter Biden also served on the board of a trade coalition that sought additional aid to Ukraine from the United States while his father remained the key figure in the White House dictating policy towards the eastern European nation, according to Daily Caller reporting last month.

From 2012 to 2018, Hunter Biden was on the board of the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC) which lobbied the U.S. government for increased Ukrainian spending and assistance.

Since it seems most politicians leave office far more wealthy then when they were elected, the success of other Biden kin are ignore here. The Internet is replete with Biden stories.

 


 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Real Joe Biden

Opuscula

Who is the real
Joe Biden who
Wants your vote

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Opuscula

Must everything be
All white or all black?
Where are the grays?

 

BERNIE SANDERS, who by his own admission is a Democrat Socialist — more leftist Democrat or Socialist? — is being taken to task by Republicans for stating a fact: Fidel Castro made education a focal point of his regime.

Although I am not a fan of Sen. Sanders, what he said about Castro is true.

Sen. Sanders, to the best of my knowledge, never said Castro was a nice guy or that his government was good to, or for, the Cuban people.

IT IS POSSIBLE TO FIND SOMETHING positive to say about almost anyone.

    Tomás de Torquemada, Hitler, and Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer are notable exceptions to that generality.

It may not be popular among Democrats, but President Trump HAS improved the economy and HAS reduced unemployment and HAS brought back jobs to the U.S.

It may not be popular among Republicans, but ex-president Obama DID push through a health plan and DID bring about the destabilizing Arab Spring that toppled governments throughout the Middle East.

 

Gray (grey) areas

Rarely is anyone 100 percent this or 100% that.

There always are “exceptions to the rule” that muddy our perceptions.

Given the reality of this, why are we so quick to condemn someone who even suggests that someone might have a redeeming feature?

In Israel, there are many who claim that all “Palestinians” just want to murder Israelis. Yet, during forest fire season, “Palestinians” help Israelis put out fires. It doesn’t make the headlines, but it happens. On the other side of the coin, there are “Palestinians” who are taught all Israelis are monsters, when in reality many “Palestinian” lives are saved in Israeli hospitals.

    Since, unlike the “Palestinians,” Israelis include Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others, equating “Israelis” only with “Jews” is not accurate.

 

Sensationalizing the norm

The media, left, right, and in between, seems to have slipped from reporting the facts sans emotion to sensationalizing almost everything.

It IS what is said — written — and HOW it is written that determines how a reasonable reader responds.

I doubt any internet gazetteer can write a “straight” news story sans hyperbole. The “right” is no better or worse than the “left.” There seems to be no “middle” when it comes to politics. Even this blog if given a close read will show a slight bias.

Perhaps we have become accustomed to what used to be called “tabloid headlines.” Not necessary accurate, but bound to get the potential reader’s attention. Most of us get our “news” from tv that mimics the tabloids.

 

Half truths

Worse, by far, than tabloid headlines are one-sided reports. Half truths are no better than full lies.

Police shoot man in front of his house

The headline may be 100 percent accurate, but what is missing is WHY the cops fired their guns.

Even in the “old days” of real newspapers where headline writers were limited by available space, good editors demanded honest headlines.

    As a newspaper man I used to break my head getting headlines to fit AND be complete. I loved the challenge.

We are cursed with poorly written biased headlines and poorly written biased “news” copy.

We are left with half-truths and distortions of facts.

Fidel Castro WAS a dictator who owed the U.S. for its help over-throwing the Batista regime. (So much for “influencing elections.”)

John Kennedy put an embargo in place to prevent importation of Cuban products … AFTER he laid in a large supply of his favorite Cuban cigars.

There used to be a radio program featuring Paul Harvey (right). Mr. Harvey always ended the program with the comment “Now you know (pause) the rest of the story.

Sen., Sanders was correct in his statement about Castro. A good reporter should have dug a little bit to find out what else the senator said about the despot. That would have provided a complete story to make Paul Harvey proud.





PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

Comment on Where are the grays?

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Opuscula

Is Bernie aware?

 

I'VE WATCHED CANDIDATE BERNIE SANDERS stammer and stutter when asked a question by debate moderators and reporters.

Now I see that he's "suspended" his "Jewish outreach" person for her language. Her derogatory - and sometimes inaccurate - statements about Israel and its leadership apparently caused Sanders some concern.

I don't object to his denigrating Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu. I don't think much of the man as a politician. But aside from calling him דו פמיים (two faced) for his frequent flip-flops, I keep my public opinion of the man at least civil. Netanyahu is Israel's problem.

These are not the first days of the campaign, and while Sanders admittedly joined the fray late, I fail to see why - at this stage - he hasn't found advisors he can trust and who won't embarrass him as his "Jewish outreach" person did with some Jewish potential voters.

Sanders has his Socialist themes, and they are attractive to some, particularly the young people who show up at his rallies. Free college is appealing to the too-young-to-vote fans who loudly support him. In the excitement no one seems to want to ask the question: How is this going to be funded? Who's going to pay?

Most of us know the story of the young divinity student who wants to marry. The girl'[s father notes the boy lacks a job and an education that will land him a decent paying job. When he challenges the young man, the boy's answer always is "God will provide." The father, talking to his wife, tells her "He thinks I'm god!"

I'm afraid Sanders thinks the U.S. taxpayers are "god" who will provide.

The question before Democrats is:

    Do you want a candidate who often is confused or

    Do you prefer a candidate who violates national security laws and who sat on her political duff while the consulate in Benghazi burned and four Americans were murdered?

Republicans also have to make a decision: do they want to maintain the status quo or do they want a candidate who is hardly "politically correct."

I wish I had said that

    ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION: the inability to become aroused over any of the choices for President put forth by either party in the 2016 election year.